Please don't trust any Chinese company will protect your data, because even my company will sale or buy some personal data, we will gather as much data as we can.
> even my company will sale or buy some personal data, we will gather as much data as we can.
What does this even mean? What is the subtext here? Because your company (which one?) is regarded as high status (higher than Alibaba?) / serious about data protection (but then you say it sells personal data?) ?
The practice of your company has no bearing of the practice of Alibaba. Alibaba could be better, Alibaba could also be worse.
Disclosure: I'm a Chinese working oversea and am genuinely interested in reacquaint myself with the business practice in China.
Hey that's not cool. How can you just disqualify a company that way just because they are Chinese? Alibaba is an excellent company with a lot of integrity.
Wener seems to be Chinese and working for a Chinese company [1]. They didn't state their reasons for not trusting Alibaba clearly, but that doesn't mean they're speaking from ignorance or prejudice.
I have no solid opinion myself, as I have no real knowledge either way.
I think the trust deficit towards Chinese companies is due to their government. The government can just force their companies to hand over all data. They already do for their own citizens.
The US doesn't have a great firewall they force all data to go through which they utilize to weaponize javascript served from their own companies to international citizens. China does this. They used their great firewall to modify Baidu javascript to serve malware to international users to turn web browsers into a DDoS against github. All because github hosted projects that allowed Chinese citizens to read the uncensored web.
So, no, you can't trust anything hosted in mainland China. And, no, it's not the same as the US.
In the US, there is due process. Granted, that due process has been seriously eroded over the years in cases where the government can claim terrorism, but otherwise, it still takes a court order to force a company to comply with a government request for information.
Right now, apparently at terrorism. And there is still a line, a court must approve it, might be a kangaroo court, but a judge is signing off on things.
That it shouldn't have happened in the first place? That our legal process is pretty damn broken? I have a similar story in NYC except I never sued so I didn't get a check. Just a massive waste of my time, energy and money and no recourse.
the worrying fact is that the govt is whole and sole of the society, it can happen that one day they just kick out the company from mainland. Just like Google left china few years back, I don't think US is this bad. I hope not.
Due process, transparency, the option to overthrow the government. China has none of these. Hell, their government can ban the words "net neutrality" and "freedom" if they want to tomorrow, with no protest or recourse options. Very few countries have these kinds of constraints on companies.
I think we are also conditioned to not trust China. Certainly in the U.K. coverage about China is always negative, from dog stews to mafia-styled political stories. And of course the fact that China is gobbling so much and so fast ... Alibaba is apparently much bigger than Google and Amazon combined. Who's to say that Alibaba isn't the commercial face of the Chinese government? I think that's what we're really wary about.
Rational or irrational, we're definitely jealous, so whatever, that's high compliment for China. But China really is becoming a super, which means it's a threat to the old order. In South East Asia, it was once unthinkable to not see the US as an ally. Now this is shifting, for better or for worse cough South China Sea