Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's so cute when neuroscientists try to be philosophers. They're so poorly cut out for the job.

(He needs to read more Husserl.)



They said the same thing of physicist, biologists, geologists, chemists, etc. before, that is until they found themselves irrelevant. I suspect in time, it will happen again.


which they is this?


Philosophers, I think. But the field as a whole seems to treat relevance as an afterthought.


in part this is because whenever something relevant comes up, it gets a name that is not philosophy.

Also because we're still shaking off perception of philosophers as useless navel-gazing victorians; post WWI, the field has become substantially more akin to formal math and logic.


I second the vote for Husserl. Merleau-Ponty could help, too.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: