That seems to square with the content I'm frequently tested in. Crosswalks and traffic signs for self driving cars and stairs for walking robots.
I've also noticed that captchas are getting more difficult. Is that because the AI needs to sharpen recognition skills or because that's needed for differentiating human from 'bot?
That's a good cheap option, but for me the most convenient way to power it is with USB-C. I just use the same 60W USB-C PD power block and beefy USB-C cable that I carry in my bag anyways. The cable is also much more flexible than the ones with the barrel jack I've used before, so it is easier to hold and control while soldering.
Ah, yes. More complaining about freely posting content publicly on the internet and then being upset when it's used in a way you don't want. I'm sure foreign companies and even governments are doing something similar, what will U.S. laws do to stop that?
Why is this assumed to be an issue of intentionally 'injecting ads into Bing Chat', and not just a side effect of parsing Bing search results that may include advertisements that have always been there? The later seems much more likely, and they are even explicitly marking info coming from ads as such.
I feel like the difference is about the product. On search engines its like you are browsing a catalog or magazine. You know what is an ad, and there are many options to choose from. With a Chatbot it is more similar to talking to a person where they give you a direct answer to your question (instead of just handing you a piece of paper with a bunch of options). I think the format makes all the difference. You expect when you are talking with a "person" to be given un manipulated information. You don't expect this person is taking money in the background to influence what is said. You do know politicians purchase advertising too??
Those two examples are the exact use-case that defining scripts in pyproject.toml are meant for. Users of my installed package would never need to run `twine publish` or build the project's docker image. That's only really needed by developers who would be working from the full project source including pyproject.toml.
I seriously don't understand why everyone is scrambling to cripple AI in an effort to maintain human copyright bs. Do you think upcoming AI models from countries like China are going to care about whether or not it learns from copyrighted, or even illegally obtained data? No, which means that their AI systems will be much more capable than ours. We will be left in the dust because everyone is too worries about losing credit or not getting paid.
Same thing with OSS licensing. Once you publicly release your code onto the internet, it is out there permanently. Anybody can read it, learn from it, and copy or reproduce it, regardless of whether or not the original developer wants them to. Any copyright or licensing issues are enforced by human laws, only relevant if you live in the country that the laws apply. So again you have companies in places like China who take OSS projects and use the code, and there is not a damn thing anybody can do about it.
When someone goes on deviantart and the like, they want to see art produced by people, not to have to wade through oceans of AI-generated pigswill before reaching the flesh-and-blood person.
In my mind, art is meant to have at least some amount of communication between artist and viewer; no one is communicating anything by typing "trending on artstation" into midjourney then heading off to lunch while it spits out a thousand images.
