Nor January, 1930.

This economy is in a bad and worsening state. But it definitely can get a whole lot worse.

The last time this happened, did the AG prosecute the person who discovered the vulnerable data?

Ah, I think I recall the story you're referring to: reporter Josh Renaud of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch discovered that a public web site was exposing Social Security numbers of teachers in Missouri. He notified the site's administrators, and later published a story about the leak after it was fixed.

The governor of Missouri at the time, Mike Parson, called him a hacker and advocated prosecuting him. Fortunately the prosecutor's office declined to file charges though.

Poor Jepsen.

The app is unusable. I have a subscription available to me. I try to use it from time to time. The app is unusable.

You can use the web.

I am not sure what your point is. Is it that no CS is valuable or that only certain CS degrees are valuable?

Fujitsu has never been served justice for Horizon.

This is a joy.

Berkeley, for disambiguation.

Oops, too late to edit my comment!

Google incentivizes takedown vote abuse. 1. 3 Strikes rules for channels 2. Automatic takedown systems based on votes 3. Incentivizing competing channels with ads 4. No verification/limits/punishment of bogus takedown voters and vote bots 5. Lack of democritized, universal takedowns of equivalent content

Does Microsoft unfairly benefit from Google's takedown tirefire? I do not know.

But if I were designing a voting system for takedowns it would be: 1. 1 non-DMCA takedown vote per user per year 2. No takedown votes for accounts less than 1 year old 3. Takedown all equivalent content when a video is voted down. 4. Verification of DMCA ownership before taking down DMCA-protected content.

It is not a mandatory feature.

Yes, it is mandatory for OEMs.