Is the model in ONNX format or PyTorch format?

That’s a heck of debugging.

The customer spends money to buy the product along with the source code offered. It's part of the transaction. Not honoring part of the transaction is a breach of contract.

This hash table is pretty good. It has at best one memory read if there’s no collision. Randomized key might introduce any level of key collision though.

In regarding the Elon quote, every Tesla has a number of cameras. Tesla the company probably has more recorded video of the roads than anybody else in the world, by a large margin.

They do, but for what ever reason they are not(or don't appear to be) using it to make machine readable maps.

From what I can work out, they are using the recorded data to create models that can identify road types in realtime, vaguely zero shot. I think musk has an aversion to "HD" maps, which explains a lot.

HD maps would solve a large number of issues for them (its how lyft and wayve do it, well partly. )

Wouldn't it be obvious if Tesla vehicles were uploading gigabytes of video over wifi? This would cause many residential plans to go over their paltry quotas.

The point in TFA is that the roads captured by Tesla are likely correlated to income.

And the users of this device are typically who?

The company that needs data everywhere, not just where teslas drive.

House value has gone up along with other assets since Covid because a lot of money have been printed. A trillion here and a trillion there, pretty soon we're talking real inflation. Real estate is the real inflation hedge.

The governments of the countries that dabbling into the "think of the children" laws should build their own "safe" internets for their citizens, walling them in, requiring them to "verify their age" before letting them out of their cages into the Internet.

London, Marriot, W. Sink in the bedroom. Just No.

https://dynamic-media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-o/2e/9...

Apple also invested heavily into EV. Though not succeeded, they at least put money into new areas.

Is it worth mentioning that there are almost countless Chinese EV brands nowadays? I wonder if Apple was really trying. I’m sure it’s difficult, of course, but it seems like every week there’s a new car manufacturer. To quote Clarkson ‘how hard could it be’ ;)

Maybe they tried and didn’t find that they could be competitive with the hundreds of Chinese EV producers. The market was crowded, and they didn’t see what special value they could add? I mean, it’s already cliche that xiaomi decides to release one, but they released a heat pump as well, their stores in the mall are pretty confusing.

Interestingly enough if apple really wanted they could acquihire one of the currrent EV brands and do a beats/siri on it. Theres probably a lot of churn currently before the field stabilises , and probably the entry point for a new entrant would be currently closing.

What value could apple add though? They would just be diluting their brand. Even the beats acquisition is confusing.

Yeah, even the industrial design angle seems a bit on the wane.Most likely move to open a new product lineand integrate it into the apple ecosystem. At this point they havent had any new product lines or innovations rather than thinner and custom chip designs , if they want to go that way.Although i think a better fit for them would be one of the humanoid robot firms and apply some of that industrial design they are(were) famous for.

I guess I could go with an apple bot...especially if they partner with someone that really does AI. The Chinese techs however are better positioned to do this, even if a trade war cuts off access to the USA, they still have the rest of the world. One wonders what could have happened if Google didn't get rid of Boston Robotics.

I wasted so much late night hours on Netrek in the computer lab.