Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | tu7001's commentslogin

We all know what's an answer when there is a question mark in the title.



"Anybody who has used Google for search over the past year knows that it lets a lot of LLM-generated spam" I haven't used google for years, so what does it exactly mean?


Google search results are full of garbage pages populated with LLM generated content (the pages exist solely to serve ads and capture search results).

Search spam is not new, but the use of LLMs simplifies the ability to make pages that look like legit content (increasing the likelihood they’ll show up in search results).


Are there any other studies in the topic except on mice?


Generally the answer is 'no' to that question.

Medical ethics tends to prohibit it, especially in a clinical setting. It's seen as doing harm to the patients, which physicians tend to frown on.

I've even heard of some papers on fasting, retrospectives -- which I think aren't technically studies but an aggregation and analysis of patient data, collected from events that have already happened, which patients voluntarily undertook -- that were banned from journals because the results may have 'encouraged harmful behavior.' Don't have any sources on that and it's a memory from like 6-8 years ago though.


As a complementary, would be nice to have the same data for the richest part of the US population.


Yep, (typing from Poland)


Anyone some good Avi youtube videos?


Sourceforge? Seriously?


Last update 2014, story checks out.


Nothing to see here, FDA's spoken.


>Science may sound irrational when you spell it out as a doctrine of doubt.

It's not true, when considering vaccines, that's the knowledge we, for some reasons cannot doubt.


Is there a chance to go to the court with such issue?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: