As a non physicist I like the idea of a moun collider more - more compact (thus should be cheaper) as well as something which haven't done in similar energy scales and therefore more likely to need new technology in building it and finding something new.
Absolutely plausible (BFGS is awesome), but this is situation dependent (no free lunch and all that). In the context of training neural networks, it gets even more complicated when one takes implicit regularisation coming from the optimizer into account. It's often worthwhile to try a SGD-type optimizer, BFGS, and a Newton variant to see which type works best for a particular problem.
Text only, no ads, and aggressive downmodding of self-promotion.
Edit: On the other hand, here we are looking at it and talking about it. Some number of us followed links in that article. Some number of them followed those to an OnlyFans page.
Another kind of protection is Reddit and Twitter remaining alive as quarantines. Rather than if they collapsed and the newer better places absorbed the refugees.
Mass spectrometry is a multi-faceted beast, and has many applications. One that comes to mind is ion mobility spectrometry. I am most familiar with FAIMS which is an extremely selective method and can detect trace amounts of specific molecules.
The challenge is piecing together what you have detected to draw conclusions about the sample - in this instance you might detect a specific molecule, but to definitively conclude that it's caused by a particular fungus requires lots of prior testing.
No, you missed the point. They have been indicated to "as co-perpetrators for committing the acts jointly with others: the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare; and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts". Physical destruction can occur without being a war crime and those war crimes can occur without any destruction. So it didn't add any useful information infact it was actively misleading because some people might think they were indicated for destruction.
Because someone is wrong on the internet, isn't that enough? I already explained it and I'm unsure what I can add aside from some examples (Siege of Jerusalem (starvation without destruction), Battle of Raqqa (destructive urban warfare, no allegations of starvation or war crimes), Siege of Mariupol (destructive urban warfare, many alleged war crimes))
The vast majority of fraud have noting to do with Israel wage theft is enormous everywhere and have nothing to do with Israel, the biggest fraudsters in history (mostly scams on USA investors like Theranos and 2008 crisis) according to quick Google have nothing to do with Israel. The obvious attempts to mafacture a negative image couldn't be more obvious.
No, but the pattern of criminals of Jewish background fleeing to Israel for protection after commiting a crime, is too often to ignore.
Same thing happened in my post communist country and the neighboring country too. Perp stole tens of millons through a banking scam in the 90s, then fled to Israel because he was Jewish and claimed persecution.
At which point should the pattern be acknowledged?
And did you ask Israel for extradition? What his name was? And is this pattern actually unique to Israel or would you find other examples of people escaping to where the law can't reach them? If Israel wanted to convict a dual citizen who fled to your country, what is the required process?
No, the leaders of my country didn't try any of that. You were the first person to think about those things. I'll pass on your suggestions and hopefully everything gets resolved.
Instead of being sarcastic you could be good faith and provide further information and explore what happened and explain what do you think Israel should do differently?
>Instead of being sarcastic you could be good faith
What was bad faith? I told you what happened. I was sarcastic because your comment was redundant and didn't add anything to the conversation, only instigating.
> and provide further information explore what happened
How does that change the situation? Are you the head prosecutor of Israel and looking to rectify the situation?
>what you think Israel should do differently?
Extradite them or put them in jail over there and stop being a safe heaven for criminals.
Becuase you made an argument with a single supporting example yet didn't name any name that could be used to verify what you said and let other people judge the case nor have you explained at any point of there was any court procedure in Israel about extradition and whatever he ended up extradited. How are we supposed to disscus particulars like that? Resorting to sarcasm so fast that you aren't interested in genuine discussion. Furthermore if he wasn't extradited, you could use this discussion to make him more (in)famous.
> How does that change the situation? Are you the head prosecutor of Israel and looking to rectify the situation?
You were claiming that many criminals abuse Israel extradition system to esapce the law. I was making (implicit) claim that there is nothing special about it and if there was abduance of such cases is merely because more people in your country had means to escape to Israel than to other places. As already explained you provided a sole lacking in information example and I wanted more.
And because you were being glib, I will be too, yes for all you know I am Israel's head prosecutor.
>didn't name any name that could be used to verify what you said and let other people judge the case
Oh, I'm sorry, is running a Google search too much?
Vladimir Gusinsky Russian media tycoon charged in 2000 with large-scale fraud tied to privatization of state assets. Arrested briefly in Russia, then fled to Spain and subsequently to Israel in 2001, where he obtained citizenship and lived for extended periods. Extradition requests (including from Russia via Greece and Spain) were denied or rejected; he used Israel as a safe haven.
Leonid Nevzlin Major Yukos oil company shareholder and executive. Charged in the early 2000s with embezzlement, tax evasion, fraud, and money laundering related to Yukos operations and privatization deals from the 1990s. Fled to Israel in 2003, granted citizenship; multiple Russian extradition requests denied by Israeli courts (e.g., in 2006 and 2008). Lived openly in Israel for decades.
Other Yukos-associated figures (e.g., Mikhail Brudno, Vladimir Dubov, and minor shareholders) Partners or shareholders in Yukos accused alongside Nevzlin and Mikhail Khodorkovsky of embezzlement, fraud, and tax-related crimes stemming from 1990s privatizations. Several fled to Israel in the mid-2000s, obtained citizenship, and avoided extradition; Israeli officials reportedly stated they would not extradite such oligarchs to Russia.
Ilan Shor (also spelled Ilan Șor), an Israeli-born businessman and politician. Involved in the 2014–2015 "theft of the century," a massive fraud and embezzlement scheme that siphoned approximately $1 billion (about 12–14% of Moldova's GDP) from three Moldovan banks through fraudulent loans and money laundering. Convicted in Moldova in 2017 (initially to 7.5 years, later increased to 15 years in absentia in 2023) for fraud and money laundering. Fled to Israel in 2019, where he has lived in exile, leveraging his Israeli citizenship (he was born in Tel Aviv). Israel has consistently refused or not acted on extradition requests from Moldova.
> I was making (implicit) claim that there is nothing special about it and if there was abduance of such cases is merely because more people in your country had means to escape to Israel than to other places.
Yes, I'm sure it's nothing special and just a coinkidink why all these financial fraudsters flee to Israel and not to Sweden, Canada, Australia or Japan.
The reason this happens is Israel gives easy citizenship to people just based on being of Jewish heritage, so these Jewish fraudster from all over the world abuse this, make a big hit somewhere, then flee to Israel with their illicit wealth for citizenship and protection.
> Oh, I'm sorry, is running a Google search too much?
You are the one who made the claim is is your job to soppurt it and I don't need to start guessing which post Soviet country you are until I land on the right guy.
Ilan Shor now lives in Russia with Russian citizenship. As for the rest of them they need to be considered. Do Russia and Moldova have Extradition Treaty with Israel?
> I don't need to start guessing which post Soviet country you are until I land on the right guy.
You don't have to guess. Search today is so good enough that you can just ask to give you "all the cases of Jewish financial fraudsters in Eastern Europe that fled to Israel". That's how I got those names. Do you think I have reserved space in my head for names I heard once 20 years ago?
>Do Russia and Moldova have Extradition Treaty with Israel?
How about you start Googling basic stuff for yourself and then tell us what you found out. I'll leave the conversation here to save my time and sanity since you're obviously just stringing people along in bad faith as you already made up your mind a long time ago and aren't interested in any productive debate or conversation so nothing I say will change your mind. It doesn't matter how many answers I'll give you, you'll just come up with more gochas and nitpicks.
Conversation and debate means "here's the information I found, here's my opinion about it, tell me what your opinion is", and NOT "go find me the information that I'm requesting, then come back to me so I can give you my opinion on it".
I literally conceded that "As for the rest of them they need to be considered" (for extradition). Yes I think this conversation is at end of usefullness. Israel has good reasons form their perspective to why they give citizenship easily and pretty much all countries don't give up their citizens without good cause (I read about a case where France didn't want to extradite to Israel because they aren't part of the EU so it wasn't legal. At the end France court sentenced them, so Israel should do the same).
What does one man living in Canada have to do with how much people in Israel love children? There have been many frauds of cancer in children. Here https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-12-14/sa-couple-alleged-fak... is one, an Australian couple asking donations for a fake cancer. Is it reasonable to believe Australia doesn't like children because of it? No in fact it so ridiculous that even asking it is frankly stupid.
It was a quip about Israel military explicitly killing children. Not very tasteful, but it clearly wasn't about this particular scam.
By the way, indiscriminately bombing children seems to be more acceptable than opening fire on them for some reason, so maybe Israel military should stick to its guns.
If the scammer were Muslim, many people would have no issue ascribing blame to swathes of people with the same religion, calling the religion itself cancer.
Huh, maybe people can ask for donations to be cured of that "cancer"...
That's easy. All of your sentences in the original post sound insanely misinformed and wrong. I suppose now that I've made an assertion it's my duty to post links to articles disproving you? The rule is, you're the first to make the claims, you need to back them up.
But with the wonderful world of the Internet, we can find anything as "proof" that anything we claim is true. Want to see proof that the earth is a flat sphere? I can do that. Tons of videos and blogs from nutjobs out there. If you want to find proof about 10000 raped and killed children, I bet you can find blogs and tweets from Elon Musk's soup of shit.
Ironically I'll trust linked ChatGPT or Gemini responses more than tweets and blogs (but not from Grok, an AI that claims Elon Musk is more athletic than LeBron James). But I bet you already know that these AI systems are censored to not tell the world about those things you already know is happening, because these systems are controlled by the man!
Show me you're not an white-supremacist extremist nutjob...
> Of these contact offences, an estimated 17,100 are ‘flagged’ as child sexual exploitation in police recorded crime data.
> New police data, the Complex Organised Child Abuse Dataset (COCAD), while suffering a number of limitations, has identified around 700 recorded offences of group-based child sexual exploitation in 2023.
> Given the lack of a prevalence survey and how under-reported child sexual exploitation is, the flaws in the data and confusing and inconsistently applied definitions and data sets, it is highly unlikely that this accurately reflects the true scale of child sexual exploitation, or group-based exploitation.
Child H (2008) was 11 years old when she came to the attention of the Police. She
disclosed that she and another child had been sexually assaulted by adult males.
When she was 12, she was found drunk in the back of a car with a suspected CSE
perpetrator, who had indecent photos of her on his phone. Risky Business became
involved and the Locality Team did an initial assessment and closed the case. Her
father provided Risky Business with all the information he had been able to obtain
about the details of how and where his daughter had been exploited and abused, and
who the perpetrators were. This information was passed on to the authorities.
Around this time, there were further concerns about her being a victim of sexual
exploitation. She was identified as one of a group of nine children associating with a
suspected CSE perpetrator. Her case had not been allocated by children’s social
care. The Chair of the Strategy meeting expressed concern about her and
considered she needed a child protection case conference. This does not appear to
have been held. Three months later, the social care manager recorded on the file
that Child H had been assessed as at no risk of sexual exploitation, and the case
was closed. Less than a month later, she was found in a derelict house with another
child, and a number of adult males. She was arrested for being drunk and disorderly
(her conviction was later set aside) and none of the males were arrested. Child H
was at this point identified as being at high risk of CSE. Risky Business, social care
workers and the Police worked to support Child H and her father and she was looked
after for a period. She suffered a miscarriage while with foster carers. Her family
moved out of the area and Child H returned home. Some of the perpetrators were
subsequently convicted.
reply