Anyone thinking of adding a feature or separate tool for exporting existing gitlab/github issues to this Ticket or Beads? Looks like in the Agentic Era having issues/tickets managed using this kind of tools and kept in folders side by side with code and documents is much more desirable than separating them to web based git servers

The author’s LinkedIn profile is also crafted by AI (and the person invented I guess). I’m asking myself if this is a joke, an experiment or a sort of a scam.

I am a real person. Not invented and not a scam, but enhanced for sure :) . I use the tools I have.

I have been in tech for 25+ years and love programming but I have been busy running my company the past few years and too busy to write code and I MISSED IT A LOT, when AI-assisted coding came about, it drastically reduced the friction.

Vibe coding + Years of Experience = Vibe Engineering and it is AMAZING.

I feel like Tony Stark every day. I wake up every day and review code from several agents on several projects and sometimes i start a new agent when i am bed because of a thought/idea I had and when i wake up in the morning the feature i wanted is ready for review and can be live live in under 30 minutes. that is incredible.

Very good then, and sorry for my skepticism! Indeed you’re making good use of LLM on all aspects of your professional life. I’m curious: the same applies to your hobbies and personal life? Any use of LLM that changed also those?

OMG. It has changed everything from “plan me a trip to XYZ for 4 days” to “how do I address my son’s questions about XYZ topic” to “help me create a simple trust for my mom” to spiritual questions to history and philosophy and home automation etc…. I am a woodworking hobbyist and it helped me estimate wood quantities and cut lists and preferred species for different projects and different finishes etc…

The only one it has failed in answering is “how do I make my wife happy” lol

I am not sure, why invented? Because of a AI enhanced profile picture? If it is AI slop, just flag it. But if it is AI assisted content and the creator is a real person wanting to build up reputation ... then I guess fine by me, if the content is fine. Is it?

(does not look like that to me)

why would it not be fine if the content is fine but it's fully AI generated? Just curious on why that would not be on with you

As long as the content is fine, all is fine by me.

This thread is becoming huge and so searching through the comments is not easy. Nonetheless it’s my impression that little or no attention was directed to the regulatory compliance needed for vehicles to be marketed under the rules of UN (known as UN/ECE Regulations and approval scheme) and similar approaches worldwide. Which means that roughly speaking that the security and safety of the car being sold today rest assured until I don’t change (upgrade) the software governing its functionalities. It’s totally unclear how it might be possible at least in Europe to upgrade major parts of vehicles software without breaking its approval. Comments on this?

This is really at the boundaries of my comprehension of physics but it’s a remarkable achievement of Italy, Europe and international Academic institutions at large - we need them all!!!

Is it me, or the affiliations are totally missing in the cited paper?? Looks like they come from a mix of UK / US institutions

This is trending on HN at the same time of another related citation, which makes a lot of sense: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42943973

Promising. Looks like it can leverage existing requirements if included in the git repository as ReqIF exchange format files. I’m currently not able to verify with an experiment because I’m dealing with huge sets of requirements and I easily reach the limits of API (I guess), need to trim down. Any experience by others?

The point (as discussed now within interested parties) is that Technical Standards, and namely Harmonized Standards in the realm of the so called "New Approach" to products compliance, are now cited as recommended and voluntary technical measures for reaching compliance to some EU Directive or Regulation. Up to now, technical standards are discussed and published in sort-of private organizations, although sometimes funded by governments. Here the court expressed the opinion that these Harmonized Standards have somehow lawful relevance and should be freely available (not paywalled) to all EU Citizends.

There’s still very few details on the technicalities of the safety issues, anyone more informed?

On this topic (certified libraries) I suspect an interesting evolution might happen: by observing how you guys at Ferrous achieved this milestone while keeping a consistent openness, other actors (companies, consultancies and academic institutions) start seriously thinking about the possibility of contributing with high quality and certified libraries for a lot of scenarios. In other words I’d look at this as a milestone that opens to new and disrupting ideas

Yes, and this does indeed happen. Turns out publishing such a thing makes people get in touch.