Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | spiffotron's commentslogin

this actually looks amazing as well, feels very vaguely a bit like classic macos


no


I've used nextDNS for years but the past few weeks its been breaking websites left, right and centre so I gave up on it entirely. Everything feels much snappier since I dropped them for a different option too


You definitely want to be following yokoffing's NextDNS Configuration Guide [1] to set it up. You basically only want to be using one of the Hagezi blocklists [2] and a possibly a few other options based on your preferences.

I have it running on every device in my household and it works absolutely fine. I keep it on Hagezi Pro++, and that requires me to go through and whitelist some sites I use. That can be annoying, so in that case Hagezi Light or Normal should work just fine to block ads/trackers and not break things you have to go in and manually fix.

OTOH, Control D offers free DNS [3] that includes using the Hagezi blocklists and other lists, but it's just a set and forget type setup as you can't look at log files to see if it's blocking stuff you don't want or anything like that. Scroll down to "3rd Party Filters" to see their offerings.

[1] https://github.com/yokoffing/NextDNS-Config

[2] https://github.com/hagezi/dns-blocklists

[3] https://controld.com/free-dns


It would appear that you are not familiar with its proper use. You can identify which rule is causing the issue by reviewing the log, and then add it to your allowlist.


What different options are there that provide anything like the same features and control?


"have you ever done this indescribably niche thing, which I believe renders your argument null and void, but is in fact not relatable in the slightest?"


Good UI latency used to be standard:

https://danluu.com/input-lag/

(most recent HN discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33683278 )

The fact that it requires niche hardware and software (not "indescribably" niche) to achieve in modern times is a failure of the computer industry, not a problem with my argument. Low standards do not make mobile devices good.

And touch screen are impossible to fix even with niche configurations. I have no way to shrink my fingers to pixel size, and no way to make them transparent.


I used to use raindrop however found it a bit bloated with features I never use, I've switched to selfhosting linkding: https://linkding.link and enjoy the much more minimal experience


I'd legitimately love to know why this has worked wtf


“Claims to hate closed ecosystems but probably posted this from an iPhone”

Stop knowing me


Does anyone have any recommendations of a site or a self-hosted option for uploading photo collections? I’d love to share photos of our child with the grandparents but end up just sending the odd snap through WhatsApp, it would be nice to make an actual collection.


I self-host an instance of Lychee for all my family photos: https://lycheeorg.dev/

There are things I really like, e.g. that you can restrict access per user.

But there's no comment/chat/discussion facility, so you cannot easily get feedback on your photos.

There's also NextCloud, but I think the solutions there are a bit more rudimentary. However, if you already use NextCloud (or a similar solution like a CMS for example), you could look for a plugin. https://nextcloud.com/


I highly suggest Immich [1], it's an open-source and self-host alternative for Google Photos. It's still under very active development, but I think it's the best out there.

[1] https://immich.app/


This looks really nice


Check out ente.io, they offer both hosted and self-hosted.


Synology NAS with their photos app can do that. I.e. create albums and share them with other people


I even have a Synology NAS and for some reason have never thought to use it for this


I use porkbun for all my domains, I’ve never had any issues and they don’t seem to gouge you on price for the smallest things.


Religion being used to control people? Say it ain’t so!


This is such a tired trope, especially when made in a forum where a substantial amount of contributors believe that if they release a collection of digital files that are accompanied with the correct words which constitute something called a "license", I am obliged to follow its demands.


I'd actually hazard a guess that most "hackers" would neither read nor place any importance on any textual attempt at restriction of use of software.

What we may quibble over is the readership of this site being more "hackers" or (wannabe) entrepreneurs.


There's no textual restriction. It's the law that restricts you, the text is the thing that makes it legal for you.


Regulation for me, but not for thee?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: