The article says the company is already 74% female. If 62% female is more diverse than 50% just imagine how diverse a 100% female team would be. Diversity mathematics are tricky like that.

Debian is the go to, they maintain niche architectures and ports almost to a fault.

Over made-up micro-regressions and gaps, no less. I'm not seeing a benefit to any of this.

No, it's not. There are a finite number of .com registrars-- how many of them do you suppose want to be associated with Literal Nazis?

Even if it only serves to waste their time, hassling fascists is still a public service.

There are many privacy/free-speech oriented registrars and hosts. I hate being in the position to defend these types so often from short-sighted moralizers, but it absolutely won't work.

What are these, please?

Giving racists, on either the left or the right, is never a waste of time...

GoDaddy is infamous for suspending service without notice and not standing up for their customers at all.

Apparently you haven't read a ToS/AUP before, choosing GoDaddy for anything the least bit controversial was a mistake.

How do you make any business decisions when taking things this personally?

> it and made his company look bad

This may have been a nuance James missed, Google is open to _external_ social woes.

His argument was the program was flawed by bad metrics and wouldn't accomplish its goals, not directed at an individual.

I quoted him directly. He said the program lowered the bar by decreasing false negatives. Having a hard time squaring that with what you're saying his intention was.