I personally encountered that problem with browser use and I developed a listener on top that gets triggered when there’s a captcha, so it just switch off chrome headless so the user can solve it before proceeding.

What are you suggesting?

No, it’s not.

This solution went through millions of kilometres of data and tests.

RDW did a really thorough job since we’re talking about Europe: https://www.rdw.nl/en/news/2026/rdw-explanation-of-european-...

Stop. Spreading. FUD.

RDW tested it themselves. That isn't real world usage. Real world drivers will not pay the same attention, and they'll do stupid shit like game the driver attention mechanism so they can watch TikTok.

This is FUD. Supervised means that the camera watches you in realtime keeping attention.

But I get this type of comments just to go against one person.

> the camera watches you in realtime keeping attention

If this is the world you want there's literally no common ground here

How else would you determine whether the driver is paying attention?

So if you say BS you can just add /s and it’s fine?

The best part is not just that Tesla got provisional validity in the Netherlands, it is that the approval appears to come after a long testing process and with actual public reasoning attached.

Even if EU regulations are painfully strict, getting this far means Tesla FSD has cleared a serious technical and regulatory review.

I’m impressed by the BTC obsession: this will definitely impact the banking sector as a whole even before. Quantum FUD, here we come.

The banking sector can relatively trivially move to a new encryption scheme - this is one of the huge advantages of centralized systems. Also, the banking sector, rather than trying to provide anonymity/pseudonimity, has KYC - they can relatively simply disable remote access if they think a current system is no longer secure, and get everyone to come in to a physical office and get a secure version, after manually verifying they are the rightful holder of the account.

Tldr; Bitcoin relies entirely on encryption, banking does not. So broken encryption is a catastrophe for Bitcoin, but just a bad week for banking.

> they can relatively simply disable remote access if they think a current system is no longer secure, and get everyone to come in to a physical office

After all these years of it not being required? I think that's... very naive with regard to how clients would respond.

I'm not saying it would be pretty, but it would still be infinitely better than what migtn happen in Bitcoin land - where people will either be able to steal money from those wallets directly, or the owners will permanently lose access.

Upgrading decades old legacy systems? Good luck with that.

External access to banks is already using the latest versions of TLS, so no luck needed, they will just need to upgrade as they do constantly.

I was inches away from investing..

> I know Twitter/X has worse problems with spam bots in the replies, but this is the News Feed!

Probably not using it from ages.

Basically Europe solution to state/companies surveillance is an European managed surveillance, plus a CBDC to get even more into their citizens. Know your enemies, there are solutions out there.

Goodbye Discord. It was good to have you.

De facto sed non de iure