Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | rayiner's commentslogin

2024 was Iran’s first year as a member of BRICs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16th_BRICS_summit

BRICS membership is purely symbolic. It has effectively zero economic or military significance.

“Operation Epic Fury might turn Iran into a luxury resort destination” is a compelling argument only to the small subset of people who are against luxury resorts on principle.

That’s not to say that there aren’t more compelling arguments against attacking Iran.


Luxury resort destination? Isn't the Persian gulf expected to be one of the first uninhabitable places on Earth within this century?

https://news.mit.edu/2015/study-persian-gulf-deadly-heat-102...


“Catholics think Protestants are kooky” is a news headline that would work anytime in the last 509 years.

Google has become the developer-focused company that Microsoft used to be, and I don’t mean that positively. Developers are lazy and want to inflict low-effort crap on users. Microsoft always made it easier to do that. Google is now doing the same thing. Offering developers more and more ways to cobble together box-checking functionality in web apps instead of developing proper native apps.

> Google has become the developer-focused company

They’re the advertiser-focused company. Bluetooth and NFC aren’t being exposed for developers first.


Crippling web apps is a user-positive behavior. It just so happens that user’s incentives and apple’s incentives are aligned.

How many kids do you have? How comfortable is the downtown core for families with 2-3 kids?

Enough playgrounds last time I visited.

Okay, but how convenient is it to get 2-3 kids all the places they need to go using Paris’s public transport?

I don't have kids yet, but some arrondissements are very family friendly, some are not

The downplaying of Iran’s capabilities is a weird kind of racism IMHO. In the modern view, Iranians have been categorized as “brown” so people lump them together with Somalians and Afghans. But Iran is a technologically and politically sophisticated country. In terms of the Civ tech tree, it’s higher than any middle eastern country except Israel.

> The downplaying of Iran’s capabilities is a weird kind of racism IMHO.

Agreed, but it’s not at all surprising to me. Propaganda means that people will project fictitious motives and capabilities on their opponents, even if they are internally inconsistent (e.g. Iran must be attacked because they will threaten the USA mainland vs Iran’s missiles are very inaccurate and barely hit anything).


>Iranians have been categorized as “brown” so people lump them together with Somalians and Afghans.

Even from a racist perspective that's completely wrong; Iranians are white, the name "Iran" literally means "Land of the Aryans".


> Iranians are white, the name "Iran" literally means "Land of the Aryans".

The Indians were also Aryan according to race theories. I wouldn't put much sense into racism


Leaving the 'aryan' and 'white' bit aside there are mountains of things that are common between Indians and Iranians -- the system of classical music, musical instruments, mythological characters, food, and of course language.

Wow you just sent me through a fascinating journey through Wikipedia for a while there.

The history (and pseudoscientific justification) of racism is mind-boggling as ever.


I thought Iranians were white? I've met many Iranians that were white.

That’s what I thought, but in the modern discourse I think all Muslims are classified as non-white.

Your in-depth knowledge of completely random things never ceases to amaze me.

I'm Catholic and Twelver Shiism is the closest thing Islam has to Catholicism. It's a really neat system.

Do the missiles Iran has been raining down on other countries for decades not count as WMDs?

No.

“ A weapon of mass destruction is a nuclear, radiological, chemical, biological, or other device that is intended to harm a large number of people”

https://www.dhs.gov/topics/weapons-mass-destruction.


As many like to say, quantity has a quality of its own.

Orwellian semantic games…Iran didn’t have a WMD, so now we will modify the definition of WMD.

No. There’s a definition from the UN here if you’re interested:

https://unterm.un.org/unterm2/en/view/UNHQ/9626F6CEB2A92C9B8...


AFAICT, not by any commonly accepted definition of WMD:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weapon_of_mass_destruction#Def...


Oh, that would be quite a spin. We can probably see it in the Faux News soon.

> the late Ayatollah had a self-imposed range limit on the strikes or tests they would carry out.

Can you elaborate on what kind of strikes the Ayatollah was carrying out within the old range limit?


The IRGC directly was mostly targeting US troops in Iraq (eg the 2020 Al Asad ballistic missile attack) and frequently responded to ‘Imperial Aggression’ with missile attacks on Israel - which peaked at 2,000km... They’d also been surprisingly consistent with limiting their proxies to SRBMs so that you wouldn’t get a random Hamas or Hezbolah missile into Central Europe.

Im really hoping they enforced those limits by not sending them IRBMs rather than sending them and ‘not letting’ them use the full range because I’m getting the sense their proxies would rather land some flashy strikes on soft targets instead of having everything swatted down over Israel.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: