> Being attacked should rule out 'war of aggression'

It usually does. The argument here is about the proportion of the response.

There were tens of thousands of Iranian rockets fired at Israel just since Oct 7. Hezbollah did the majority of the launches, but there's no doubt about who sent the rockets or for what purpose. What would be a proportional response to that?

Proportion is always the argument concerning Israeli responses, never with anybody else.

I think it also searches inside documents by default.

So it doesnt work wirk adhoc venvs, does it? Might still valuable for simply running scripts, but I’m not sure venv-less works for dev

I agree with the first part. For me, AI art is the chance to have a somewhat creative outlet that I wouldn’t have otherwise, because I’m much worse at painting that I can stand. Drawing by prompts helps me be creative and work through some stuff - for that it’s also nice and interesting to see that the result differs from my mental image. I will tweak the prompt to some extent and to some extent go with some unintentioned elements of the drawing. I keep the drawing on my phone in the notes app with a title and the prompt.

To get back to the beginning: I really do agree that the societal impact on the whole appears to be negative. But there are some positives and I wanted to share my example of that.

I‘d call this politics instead of social dynamics and argue that its importance differs across companies, but generally. I’d agree though that I also don’t find this out of the norm (in those specific circumstances)

Really interesting. I always put bad estimates down to individual biases, not something more systematic. I’d be really curious to see if this also is true for bigger tasks and whether it changed over time (at least for me I can honestly say it didn’t), small insights like there might reduce friction when working within a team or with narrow deadlines

Im afraid this will get buried, but I‘ll try anyway since I haven’t seen this angle yet: I’m at a point in my career where I now feel „ready“ to answer questions on SO and want to help others. So my question turns into another direction: where should people eager to provide help go to? Is it still SO or are there other places?

- Reddit: I only stumble upon questions by accident, and often on mobile where I’m not in the mood of typing long answers or code. - GitHub: I’m mainly here looking for answers myself, is there a nice way to look over all issues for a couple of projects so that I can easily see whether I could help somewhere? - discourse, discord, …: usually framework-specific, so not as ideal/comfortable as SO I imagine

Are others on the same situation? Where do you answer questions nowadays?

A lot of SO users migrated to codidact.com

Thanks. This site looks quite useful.

I find your post quite interesting - at the same time I believe that one reason those hymns are repeated so often is that for the majority of businesses, 99% of the values lies in simply following them and not thinking too hard about theories etc. there will often be a relatively clear path forward prescribed by the software used, know how, or (where no software is used) ease of implementation.

This is precisely the reason why a theory would be valuable. The businesses can have use Legendary Backup™ for Maximal Data Safety Certifications by Us.

Im working exclusively with a remote connection (although inside the company network, so some security concerns don’t apply). I have Jupyter running as a service on Linux and am using a password instead of the generated token. So the URL stays the same and I don’t have to worry about anything much. The setup is working good for me - there are a couple of nuisances but they’re all related to the rest of my circumstances and use case, not to anything mentioned above.

Ah, so you have Jupyter itself running remotely? I was hoping you had a good workflow for starting or connecting to remote kernels using a local Jupyter frontend. This seems like such an obvious use case, but the ecosystem support for it is surprisingly poor. I've tried and failed several times over the years to figure out a workflow that a regular scientist or industry data analysit could follow.

Why are you assuming that rules weren’t followed? Is there any reason to suspect this? I’m not the greatest fan of the police by far, but it’s not like this (seizing assets without prior conviction) is a novel or anything but standard procedure happening in the frame of clearly defined rules. Should a murderer run free up to his conviction, even when there’s strong evidence of his crimes? Shouldn’t the police seize assets of drug cartels at the moment they can instead of years later when everybody is convicted?