Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | pwillia7's commentslogin

I made a DeluxePaint/Amiga LORA you can use with Stable Diffusion/FLUX a while back for the lulz[1]

I also used that LORA and some video models to try to make a little movie with the same style[2]

Here's a guide on how to generate LORAs too if you're interested[3]

Finally, there's a DeluxePaint clone someone released that is pretty cool to play around with[4]

[1]: https://civitai.com/models/875790/amiga-deluxepaint-or-fluxd

[2]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_18NBAbJSqQ&feature=youtu.be

[3]: https://reticulated.net/dailyai/creating-a-flux-dev-lora-ful...

[4]: https://github.com/mriale/PyDPainter


FFS ruining it for ppl that are old enough as well. I really wanted to try this out :/

Access Restricted for Australian Visitors As of March 16, 2026, Civitai is no longer accessible to users in Australia.

This is due to Australia's Age-Restricted Material Codes, registered under the Online Safety Act and enforced by the eSafety Commissioner. These codes require platforms that host user-generated content — including AI-generated imagery — to implement age verification measures such as facial age estimation, digital identity wallets, or photo identification checks before allowing access to age-restricted material. Simple self-declaration of age is no longer considered sufficient. Non-compliance carries civil penalties of up to AUD $49.5 million per breach.



Thank you eSafety Commissioner!

Walmart wasn't created late enough in the 2nd gilded age to effectively lobby the government against having any rules

when have we ever defined gaming/gambling as 'a thing where the house takes a rake' ? I don't understand this argument and it always feels disingenuous when brought up.

I'm not really sure what position you're taking but taking a rake can certainly change the legality of an activity; in California, playing poker in private is considered a social game and is legal, _except_ if party is taking a rake.

yeah a social _game_, not a commodity pork bellies futures market.

Legally, they have to disclose all their probabilities (under most regulatory regimes).

Er it's not. Gambling where the house takes a cut is considered a form of commercial gambling and is often made illegal or has stipulations applied to it.

If you're asking about why prediction markets fall under the CFTC, this is actively evolving but generally prediction markets are considered to be under the CFTC because they can be used to hedge against events.

For example if you're trying to do business in Oman but you're worried about Iran tensions spilling over, you could take a Yes position on an Iran conflict bet as a hedge. You may lose business but can make some of it up in the hedge.

"Gambling" the concept legally is very complicated and has a lot to be understood, so I'd suggest doing some searching or LLM asking if you want an intro on philosophical definitions or the legal landscape.


You have managed to conjure a definition of "gambling" that excludes casino blackjack.

I didn't actually define gambling? I just said it's complicated. I just mentioned that if a house takes a cut this is a form of regulated commercial gambling, distinct from social gambling.

There's a body of legislation and legal precedent that actually defines gambling and how that's distinct from markets.


This is gibberish.

You're not providing actionable feedback.

yeah who wants marginally regulated oligarchs -- Give me fully unregulated criminals!

No game loop feels impossible unless you're just making a movie you click through...

Game loops should be invisible as once a player can see or sense them it breaks the immersion.


I almost never finished games even back in the 90s/2000s. I think it's because of how long they are compared to movies and even tv shows. You also (especially back in the day) had to 'rewatch' the same part over and over until you could beat it


How do we know we're not doing that based on our memories and reaction to external stimuli though?


I mean we don't know right? Feels hubrisy


and the pendulum swings again the other way...


Does it? Or is it simply different people


I would like you to release this please


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: