Can life evolve to slow down the process of increasing entropy? For ex: Sun is throwing energy in space. What if life tries to store it and use it only when it needs? Has the sunlight gone into space (without being captured by fossilized life), it would have thinly spread out in universe(high entropy, low energy density). But plants and humans (solar cells) capturing it to create fossil fules or create some infrastructure... Is it not life going against this theory? Or is it just intermidiate step of life which eventually (life will) blast all energy in short period of time at the end like an expontial system does?

Certainly. If you look at the various steps in cellular respiration (happens in animals, starts with glucose and ends up with ATP) you'll see that it takes many of them to gradually release that energy such that it can be made use of at a rate that jives with the cell's needs. There's so much complexity that has gone into controlling this rate. It would've been much simpler to just burn it all at once and explode.

I liked the syntax of key word arguments in Python. Then asked myself on how come this is not popular in C/C++ world. After seaching internet, found the way and documented here.

https://prabhuullagaddi.substack.com/p/simulation-of-keyword...

I have same question. Is it simple <canvas>

Instead of using a templating lang for html file generation, we can use Python or Javascript. Thus, we don't need to learn one more templating lang. I never used Javascript lib that I mentioned above, but it is here for ref : https://github.com/Knio/dominate.js

I use this a SSG (Static Site Generator). This is helpful since I don't need to learn one more SSG since I am already aware of Python and little bit of html/css.

Good idea. May you please share youtube link you are referencing?

Thank you for explaining why the CadQuery and its successor Build123D are better. Thank you for explaining mesh Vs BREP.

Thank you for the link!

Some people want laws for everything.

From past 2 years, for 98% of the time, I use Linux (Mint-Mate edition). I have nVidia p600 GPU and 4K monitor. Due to some reasons, scaling does not work fine in Xfce edition, but scaling at 1x works fine in Mate edition.

Given the limitations, still I feel, using GNU/Linux is better than Windows for most use cases like surfing web, Terminals, LibreOffice, SW development etc...

1.Once we learn Intel syntax, same knowledge can re-used in other ISA (RISC-V, ARM) This is not true for AT&T syntax, hence one more no for the use of AT&T.