Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | pouulet's commentslogin


exactly, thank you


The tags are exported : https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/exporting-your-pocket-l...

What is contained in the export file?

Your export file will include links (URLs) of your saved items. The export does not extract the text of saved links. Additionally, the export does contain tags or highlights.


The page was "Last updated: 24 minutes ago". Someone at Mozilla saw this HN post and modified it (unsure if the export feature itself was changed or not).

You can tell it's a rushed edit as "Your export file will include links (URLs) of your saved items. The export does not extract the text of saved links. Additionally, the export does contain tags or highlights." reads very unnatural.

Via Wayback Machine, it can be easily verified that the old versions of it, both the one edited very recently or the old ones in 2024, said "does not contain tags or highlights".

https://web.archive.org/web/20250415002842/https://support.m...

https://web.archive.org/web/20250522175656/https://support.m...


My export from March had tags, my guess is this docs page just got missed when they updated the export months ago


Yep sorry, I saw this post, brought it up internally because I remember hearing they updated the export functionality in preparation of the shutdown, and then they fixed it while I was out. So here's your notification that the docs were updated :)

Edit: and I see now other folks noticed and shared it as well.


Doesn't have to be a conspiracy. They saw a comment about a mistake in the article and made a clumsy edit in an attempt to remedy the mistake.


I didn't mean that there is a conspiracy, just that OP wasn't lying and the doc was indeed saying it won't save tags.

(Now I read it, it does sound like so. My bad.)


No worries! Perhaps i shouldn't have assumed that so much investigation implied a conspiracy theory.


And for even more details, you can look at the relevant patch: https://lwn.net/ml/all/20241021015311.95468-1-jdamato@fastly...

The power efficiency seems to be limited to "network applications using epoll".

The 30% the article talks about seems to be benchmarked on memcached, and here is the ~30 lines diff they're probably talking about: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/martinkarsten/irqsuspend/m...


For the interested, Darknet Diaries did a great episode about that case:

https://darknetdiaries.com/episode/136/


Definitely check this podcast out. There is also one episode with the creator of the piratebay

Pure gold


This man claims to have reproduced the same kind of effects with a simple ferromagnetic sample:

https://nitter.net/VanGennepD/status/1688052003216261120


The picture on figure 4 of this paper rules out ferromagnetism, assuming it's legit https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.01516.pdf


People seem skeptical that it's actually been ruled out by that test. Regardless, that paper found diamagnetism on the level of pyrolytic graphite, which would be interesting in this material albeit not really evidence of superconductivity, but from what I've heard it is very easy to get anomalous reports of diamagnetism during zero field cooling if there is a high-temperature ferromagnetic transition, and you have to be extremely careful about your measurements and do lots of repeated tests to be sure. AFAIK, every other paper has either only seen very weak diamagnetism (expected given the compounds involved) or none at all.


except he didnt reverse the poles of the magnet like multiple replication videos so he didnt really reproduce the same effect


Do you mean flipping the magnet over? If you scroll down he did that.


Reminds me of the first episode of Devs ( https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8134186/ ) where an artificial intelligence engineer does a demo about syncing, and then predicting the future movements of a nematode worm. Great show by the way!


A great show only made greater by the fact it came before LLMs entered the public consciousness, but this concept of having information you extrapolate from with great accuracy is central to the show (all I'll say).


Creepy stuff with creepy implications, pretty fun show!


This made me think about this nice little TV show: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8134186/


There is much more than "two commonly deployed used" of MPTCP, to name a few : OpenMPTCPRouter is an improved fork from OVH Overthebox project ( https://www.ovhtelecom.fr/overthebox/ ), Tessares is a company that provide key in hand MPTCP solutions for many ISPs ( https://www.tessares.net/customers ). MPTCP was designed to be transparent for the end user, so you might be using it without knowing it, from your phone, your computer or your internet box


Pretty new to it (~3 months), I've been using it in docker, using https://github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs

The official docker version looked way too complicated imo -> https://github.com/bitwarden/server/blob/master/scripts/run....

Pretty straightforward, lightweight, no issues so far


The light(er) weight Rust server looks interesting. We might spin it up in-house and kick the tires. Thanks!


When you try to create an empty Drop, you get a weird message like this :

{"iv":"6p7sXVuJe+MR9EcAvSYNxQ","v":1,"iter":1000,"ks":128,"ts":64,"mode":"ccm","adata":"","cipher":"aes","salt":"A+pgCtAsfyQ","ct":"DNsHqh4bMEs"}


That is the encrypted packet representing your message. Once you enter the password, it displays the plain text message.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: