Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | orefalo's commentslogin

Great move Bose

Shame on you, Google. You disabled my Nest thermostat and Nest Secure alarm — I will never buy your products again.


Congrats. dashed zenith for mactop.

really neat and full featured


Apple can go to hell, their 30% fee is prohibitive.

If Jobs was still here, he would have fired all the fat management.

shame on you Apple, you are acting like M$!


Why would jobs of all people have an issue with that?


He loved their policy. He wrote it.

> “I think this is all pretty simple — iBooks is going to be the only bookstore on iOS devices. We need to hold our heads high. One can read books bought elsewhere, just not buy/rent/subscribe from iOS without paying us, which we acknowledge is prohibitive for many things.”

https://www.theverge.com/2020/7/30/21348130/apple-documents-...


>shame on you Apple, you are acting like M$!

Microsoft, for all their faults, gave us an actual operating system that people could build and distribute executables on as they saw fit with no restrictions, and they did it despite the fact that they owned almost the entire personal computing space.

Imagine Microsoft had charged everyone who distributed a Windows executable 30%, they'd have made trillions by now. Bill Gates said once that Microsoft has captured maybe 1% of the value that people have created on top of their software because they don't insert themselves between what users do with each other and I do think they actually deserve some props for that


Nah. Fuck Apple but the only reason Microsoft isn't doing the same thing Apple does with iOS is because they don't have a mobile operating system anymore.

Even on Windows, Microsoft has very similar notarization requirements as Apple. Microsoft requires either an ~400-500$/year EV cert (if you don't want to involve Azure), or more recently a $10/month subscription to Azure, which is almost the same as Apple's $99/year. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46182546


I wrote an article comparing different GUID implementations and also prepared a clear spreadsheet with side‑by‑side implementation comparisons.

https://medium.com/@orefalo_66733/globally-unique-identifier...

Looking at your implementation, I like the clean split between shard, tenant, and sequence.

However, this results in a 160‑bit format, which does not fit natively in most databases, as they usually use the UUID type. I also find 60 bits of randomness to be low (ULID also uses 60).

Last point, using a GUID is not only for sharding. It is also important for protecting against predictability, which beyond the GUID structure, requires using the right approved crypto‑safe random generator.


We should open a public petition - https://www.openpetition.org/


No, it will not. I live in the UAE, and I appreciate that my children do not have access to pornography or illegal websites, as these are blocked by the service providers.

This should be adopted by many other countries


> I live in the UAE

I'm sure you don't. Feel free to disconnect from the internet though, I don't mind. Also, I wouldn't compare the freedom to have porn with the freedom to have slaves, but it's a cultural difference, right?


Why would anyone lie about that?


would you prefer to implement your own policies for your own household, rather than subscribe to the values endorsed by your service provider?


isn't it obvious.. it was used to fortify the tent structure.


factor in power usage reduction, and it still works


I have compiled the following table to compare OLTP and OLAP

https://medium.com/@orefalo_66733/oltp-vs-olap-fb0441f57259


I found the title amusing. This died.. right after inception.

Clearly, the objectives and limitations of OLAP and OLTP differ so much that merging the two domains in a fantasy.

It's like asking two people to view through the same lens.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: