I am quite happy to mention that I have been a long-term fan of your work, thank you!

I probably used more than 100 of your wallpapers over the years. I can currently think of at least four computers in which I've stored many.

I can't quite recall when I signed up for an account, pretty sure it was pre 2005.

Thank you! Vlad.studio is not a big source of income these days, but it sure is a huge source of inspiration and appreciation. I am addicted to positive comments, I must admit :-)

Thanks, I was worried I had red that wrong

ducks

There's virtually no comparison available regarding frequency of "keystone witness" compared to "key witness," as a phrase on the internet [1^].

[1]: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%205-y&ge...

Any update, OP?

Also, Chase claims their fraud department is absolutely open on Sundays, from 9AM to 6PM ET.

https://www.chase.com/digital/resources/privacy-security/sec...

> fixed a typo

h/t for the greenfield project mention, learned something.

https://www.webopedia.com/definitions/greenfield/

I'll parse my concurrence to @LinuxBender's suggestion: Go with the CIS benchmarks[1^] vs. the NIST, at least initially.

The former is written in "common engineering language," while the latter uses a lot of governmentish/ pseudo-legalese that often raises more questions than it answers (IMHO).

[1]: https://www.cisecurity.org/blog/cis-benchmarks-june-2021-upd...

I'm days late but just happened to stumble across an FSF list of webmail services[1] that might fit what you're looking for.

[1]: https://www.fsf.org/resources/webmail-systems

This looks pretty great, thanks! (There do seem to be some dupes, within filter-sets).

I previously researched this quite a bit, and all signs pointed to Simplisafe. The Wirecutter[1^] and many other review sources agree.

(I have yet to make this purchase so I can't speak from experience.)

[1]: https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/the-best-home-sec... (no affiliation with vendor)

To clarify, am I right to interpret this:

* "I could assign phone number as primary login"

... as equal to this:

* Change old login value (wasabi@weasel.tv) to new login value (3035551212)

?

If so, personally I wouldn't like that most of my usernames were going to be same. I realize different usernames is security through obscurity at best, but that is my initial reaction.

I agree.

If username is public, then it is not secure by obscurity. Email addresses for email account are public. So by changing login from email address to phone number we enhance security.

At the same time, we change it to a unique username instead of phone number we also enhance security.