Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nodesocket's commentslogin

Excited for t5g instances to release... Eventually.

lol, what a headline. Might as well be ICE is kicking dogs and drowning babies.

Ya, why not just alias old api calls to the new if implementation details changed?

Would be interesting to hear what database they are using and how they are doing replication? Is it simple master / slave or multi-master?

Let’s Encrypt currently has a single primary with a handful of replicas, split across a primary and backup DC.

We’re in progress of adopting Vitess to shard into a handful of smaller instances, as our single big database is getting unwieldy.


Let’s Encrypt is an incredible project and the internet is better off for it. If you ever have questions about vitess or need help please let me know.

Thanks. Would love to see a tech blog post once you get Vitess implemented.

We’ve already started drafting it :)

https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder

You can find a docker-compose.yml file to get some idea.

Appears to be using MariaDB.

They shut down OCSP responders and expiry email reminders, so there really is no need to have a database apart from rate limits, auth data, and caching.

For Certificate Transparency, they are submitted to Google and CloudFlare run trees but I don't think LetsEncrypt run their own logs.


Let’s Encrypt does operate CT logs. I wrote a blog post about our current-generation logs at https://letsencrypt.org/2024/03/14/introducing-sunlight

I assume they want to store metadata instead of having to pull from the certificates itself, but maybe that’s actually easier and more performant.

When building cli and infrastructure tools and using AI my goto is go. Pardon the pun.

Are they updating the t class instances to t5g as well?

They usually end up upgrading most instance types to new graviton generations, it just takes time to do the full rollout.

Not really: burstable (“t”) instances haven't been updated in years. The current generation (“t4g”) still use Graviton2 processors. I get the impression that they would vastly prefer cost-conscious users to use spot instances.

the -flex suffix variants seem to be the new spiritual successor to the t burstable class.

eg c7i-flex.large, etc.


Ah, thank you for pointing these out! I'd missed the introduction of “flex” instance types (apparently in May last year[0] – still long overdue relative to the introduction of T4g in September 2020[1]). Curious that so far, they all appear to be Intel-based (C7i, M7i, C8i, M8i, and R8i). M7i-flex instances also cost 45% more than the corresponding T4g instances. That's sort of understandable, as the generational improvements probably bring more than 45% better performance for most workloads, but it also makes them harder to justify for the sorts of long-running,-mostly-idle duties they're being touted for.

[0]: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/new-compute-optimized-c7i-f... [1]: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/new-t4g-instances-burstable...


If you're interested in the underlying technology of flex there's some reinvent talks from last year on YouTube where they acknowledge it's based on VM live migration which is I think the first public reference to AWS using migration in their products.

I suspect the burstable types were always priced too cheaply and were more about attracting the cheap market segment which they don't need now in the days of AI money.

Burstable pricing gets complex quick when adding in the option to burst to full usage. Flex seems a lot simpler which is great.


Crazy this has so little upvotes. I thought it was a very good discussion with lots of interesting perspectives. I assume, the "wisdom" of the HN crowd see's Rogan and goes... Nope.

Jensen Huang is an incredible storyteller. Lots of wisdom and original stories of the start of NVIDIA, how Sega helps them, the origin of FSD Tesla and OpenAI. Lots of personal and the growth of Jensen himself. Respectful.

The very end of the interview where he talks about coming to America and going to school in Kentucky (very rough and poor area) was a great story that most people don't know about him.

Anyone who is interested in AI and how Jensen thinks should listen to this. Lots of good / interesting arguments here.

Nobody cares. we are tired of AI.

I'm looking at deploying SeaWeedFS but the problem is cloud block storage costs. I need 3-4TB and Vultr costs $62.50/mo for 2.5TB. DigitalOcean $300/mo for 3TB. AWS using legacy magnetic EBS storage $150/mo... GCP persistent disk standard $120/mo.

Any alternatives besides racking own servers?

*EDIT* Did a little ChatGPT and it recommended tiny t4g.micro then use EBS of type cold HDD (sc1). Not gonna be fast, but for offsite backup will probably do the trick.


Hetzner VM with mounted storage box.

https://www.hetzner.com/storage/storage-box/

It's not as fast as local storage of course, but it's cheap!


I'm confused why you would want to turn an expensive thing (cloud block storage) into a cheaper thing (cloud object storage) with worse durability in a way that is more effort to run?

I'm not saying it's wrong since I don't know what it's for, I'm just wondering what the use-case could be.


I've quickly come to this conclusion. Essentially looking for offsite backup of my NAS and currently paying around $15-$20/mo to Backblaze. I thought I might be able to roll my own object store for cheaper but that was idiotic. :-)

Totally fair. There are some situations where you can "undercut" cloud native object storage on a per TB basis (e.g. you have a big dedi at Hetzner with 50TB or 100TB of mirrored disk) but you pay a cost in operational overhead and durability vs managed object store. It's really hard to make the economics work at $20 price point, if you get up to a few $100 or more then there are some situations where it can make sense.

For backup to a dedi you don't really need to bother running the object store though.


Shot you an email about how we can potentially help you with this.

Doesn't Chrome Developer tools automatically un-minify?

I love Mitchell’s X post awhile back:

“What the monetization strategy of Ghostty?”

“My monetization strategy is that my bank account has 10 digits in it…” lol, epic.


Original post: https://x.com/mitchellh/status/1964785527741427940

> I get asked the same about terminals all the time. “How will you turn this into a business? What’s the monetization strategy?” The monetization strategy is that my bank account has 3 commas mate.


tres commas and doors that go like this

chad


Ha. That counts the cents, though, I assume? I didn't think Hashicorp was that big, right?

Hashicorp was sold for 6.5B to IBM.

Another thing - when it went public it was valued at 13B and Hashimoto owned 8.5% of it according to the filing.

So, depending on when he sold or converted his shares it is pretty plausible that he got a billion.


Shockingly I believe billionaire with a B. They timed the acquisition nearly perfect in terms of market conditions. Tres comma club!!!

Loving the idea that he got a bank transfer for $1b and it’s still just sitting there in his checking account.

I would assume it's not sitting in his checking account. He hopefully has wealth advisors; earning interest, investments, tax strategies. Mitchell is super smart, so almost certainly not sitting in a checking account.

was that big

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: