I'll add one more to this, "Pleasant personality". If you have are difficult to be with, you will be miserable and so will others around you, leaving you with very little or no allies. So new formula:
Valued = Useful + hard to find + easy to work with
"Easy to work with" is a wide requirement. It's harder to find.
But we can compare how far "easy to work with" goes in a more balanced scenario:
You're hiring for a critical rare skill. _Only two_ candidates were seriously considered, and you hired them both.
One of them delivers for the skill you hired (useful), but is not easy to work with.
One of them does not deliver for the skill you hired (useless), but is easy to work with.
So, it doesn't matter what your definition of "easy to work with" is in this scenario. It justs matters that whatever it is, it's not related to usefulness (so you can't get away with "but being useful makes you easy to work with").
Who would you lay off if your bills were depending on those guys?
They almost certainly only do greedy sampling. Beam search would be a lot more expensive; also I'm personally skeptical about using a complicated search algorithm for inference when the model was trained for a simple one, but maybe it's fine?
"you're not done actually when you learn how compilers work you also need to
learn how linkers and loaders work and you need to learn how to operating
systems work before all of the magic is gone. So you really want to learn
compilers and operating systems and then get this book that I have called Linkers
and Loaders it's like the only book on linkers and loaders. I should have
brought it and uh and it's really good"
Assuming you are using recent interest rates. If you mix in recent inflation rates too it doesn't work out in inflation-adjusted dollars like that, though hopefully a lot of that is transitory from covid (or maybe we have something worse than covid in the future).