Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mtremsal's commentslogin

Thank you, this was excellent! From McMansions, to F1, to eroticism the author has quite the range!


If you mean the "consumer ecosystem", then Gemini 3 should be available as an API through Google's AI Vertex platform. If you don't even want a Google Cloud account, then I think the answer is no unless they announce a partnership with an inference cloud like cerebras.


Then white plays 1 stone, capturing all the black stones at once, essentially resetting the game with a 360 points lead.

(black goes first, white has Komi, so really a 260+komi points lead)


White cannot play on the last empty point as this would be suicide, which is prevented by the (assumed) superko rule forbidding repetition of the empty position.


IIRC technically there's no such thing as a "renewal". It's just a new application that bypasses the lottery. So given the low level of thought that goes into these EOs, the answer is almost certainly "yes"...


I was wrong. They’re attaching the fee to the lottery, somehow.


Which would make MCP registries the new App Stores?


At the very least, the new [extension stores](https://chromewebstore.google.com/category/extensions). I think the point here is that Agents could redefine how we interact with the internet, even if they don't change the internet itself.

ChatGPT has their [GPTs](https://chatgpt.com/gpts) marketplace, which could be considered an app store, but I'm not sure if it'll take off quite like Google Play or Apple's App Store.


This is neat. I wonder what the delta is between this and NextDNS (who funds/powers the non-profit). I imagine NextDNS blocks a superset of the baseline of dangerous domains blocked by dns0.eu? Is the main addition primarily advertising and analytics related?

edit: another key addition by NextDNS is a global infra footprint, rather than just in the EU. Oh it looks like there’s no anycast with the non-profit as well? And you have to pick your local resolver. I guess that makes sense because the main value prop of NextDNS (to me) is when I’m traveling and a local pi-hole won’t suffice.


I thought the two sounded similar, then I saw at the bottom they both have come from the same two founders. Nice to have a straightforward alternative to NextDNS to recommend to relatives.


> We have a free version. For now, we have kept it invite-only. Question is TOFU.

Comment from `amanchanda`, i.e. the OP.

Nice hustle writing an Ask HN post to then plug your own product, but you have to make sure to respond to questions with your _other_ account `nicooo`. ;)


That was in response to someone saying:

> Find a way to make it free to start.

FWIW I looked at all the posts on this thread from `amanchanda` and `nicooo`, and didn't see any obvious reason to think they were the same person.


Many EU countries have done the same in recent weeks. This is less about putting diplomatic pressure, and more about warning people to avoid traveling to the US due to real danger.


Nope, all those warnings were basically "make sure your paperwork/visa is in order" and "gender on passport has to be the one assigned on birth"


There is no real danger so this is mostly diplomatic pressure.


German and another Europeans were detained by ICE and ended up spending weeks in solitary confinement, past their plane back.


The US government has already been rounding people up who haven’t committed a crime. Most notably a student from Columbia college. This is a real danger.


They've also been shipping people off to a prison in El Salvador without due process and, according to them, no way to bring them back if they send the wrong person.

Avoiding travel to the US right now is a perfectly reasonable decision.


Have you ever experienced being detained by CBP?


No I haven't because the odds of it happening to an ordinary person are a rounding error, now and at any other point in time.


Nobody wants to be that rounding error.


IIRC Piketty's book also made a similar suggestion of having the government as an employer of last resort, i.e. offering an unlimited number of jobs at a guaranteed minimum income. It's seen as a more "palatable" policy by many, as it's "just a job" and we've already tried something similar during the New Deal. For people who take these jobs, there's also a lot less stigma than "taking social security".


IIRC the remaining risk lies in multiple people winning or attempting arbitrage simultaneously, thus dividing the expected revenue by the number of winners. So not a free lunch.


IIRC, there was at least one case where the lottery got wise that this was happening and refused to sell the parties involved any more tickets. They had enough tickets for better than even odds, but not a guarantee. IIRC, they won.


I remember a 1990s lottery event in which a "buy all combinations" was attempted, but their physical machines they acquired were partially deficient, and they simply couldn't physically acquire enough tickets in time (as the procedure was relatively time intensive), but they still won with something like a 75% probability of success


On its face this sounds like it makes sense but why would the lottery care, at all? They get money per ticket, a story that buying lots of tickets increases your chances of winning, it's win win win for them.


I believe it's a marketing/psychology thing - people like to hear stories about how people like them won (busy person wins big from inexpensive last minute purchase) because they can relate and are more likely to buy a ticket in the next draw. Hearing that some international syndicate with big money and clever mathematicians won makes the everyman think that a big win is out of reach for them.


I've heard of this happening, but it was 20+ years ago and so I'm not sure how to look this up.



Fortunately the Internet Archive has a copy in the Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20190611150403/https://www.msn.c...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: