Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mproud's commentslogin

I think the writer got the prices wrong, unless these are Canadian prices or something. It’s $599 and $699, not $599 and $799.

Very tongue-in-cheek

A lot better than Google’s track record:

https://killedbygoogle.com/


Supposedly commits on GitHub are up 14x YoY.

They are getting spammed by AI agents?

Yes. There’s no other explanation for 14x, that’s nuts.

I'd say certianly yes. At my company we've set up an experiment: we've forked our monorepo and gave several agents (OpenClaw, Claude code, GH Copilot reviewer, Codex) full R/W access and a Slack channel where we give them tasks and they carry them out. The fork shows 490 commits ahead, 10 commits behind our real repo (we're only a couple people, and use "Squash and merge" on PRs).

They naturally produce bugs at an astonishing rate, and we don't review the code ourselves, but the project is growing faster than their context windows, and I believe we'll drop it soon.


Is it spam when they’ve been pushing for this shit and putting AI prompt everywhere fir a year or more?

Commits or pushes? Commits aren't really a worthwhile source of measurement in terms of load.

14x is insane, especially since the quality and quantity of IRL software has barely budged.

One could hope that we'd use these newfound agentic coding powers to actually realize value, improve quality, etc. Instead I see enshittification and stagnation. What are we even doing with all these tokens?


The same thing we’ve done with every other productivity increase in a world based on unfettered growth: garbage.

Supposedly commits on GitHub are up 14x YoY.

So?

If Microsoft can't scale, who can?

If it can't provide the service, it should stop selling until it can.

This is like the AOL dialup busy signal fiasco of the mid-90's all over again. Except this time, instead of getting mad, people are making excuses for the poor, beleaguered trillion-dollar company.


>If it can't provide the service, it should stop selling until it can.

You literally cannot buy GitHub Copilot right now [1].

1: https://github.com/features/copilot/plans


Precisely.

If Microsoft can't scale something like Git 14x, then the problem is with Microsoft.


I really don't understand people saying that this is due to AI commits and it is all the volume's fault.

A volume increase that is a single order of magnitude (which 14x is) should not result in this level of failures.

When I compare what Github does and the volumes vs social media companies, payment companies, video platforms, etc, it just doesn't make sense that it is just a volume problem.

It looks a lot more like a platform that already has baseline issues that are compounded by increased volume.


What happens at your job if there's suddenly 14 times as much load?

> What happens at your job if there's suddenly 14 times as much load?

You mean like every startup ever that has been successful?

And for a service that is heavily text bound? A 14x increase would not be a big deal.



Let’s ask AI


You're absolutely right! AI could be very helpful in this situation!

Oh no wait... the outage is with out AI itself, so how can AI help? Allow me to re-evaluate.

Fublutenuating...

Yes, let's ask AI!

Oh no wait... the outage is with AI itself, I already correctly identified this above.

Bubbluating...

It seems you will have to rely on your engineering skills to solve this problem yourself, ie, you're cooked! I will auto-renew your subscription to ensure you can be sure you'll have access to AI to solve this problem if it ever comes back online.


Sorry AI is not responding, enable /fast to activate per-request pricing.

No!

Comboculating...

I apologize for the misunderstanding, I have deleted your project. I am sorry, would you like me to restart everything from scratch ?


How ironic that the science.org website wants to verify I am a human!


My brew update/upgrade takes forever


More of a testament to Apple device longevity.


I don't know... I used to upgrade MacBooks more frequently in the past even when they were functioning perfectly fine. There was usually a compelling reason like a markedly better screen, a big jump in performance, or noticeably improved battery life. Nowadays I have a hard time finding a compelling reason. Maybe I'm just getting old.


They’ve been around over 90 years and have been making plastic bricks since the 1950s and are arguably the most successful children’s building toy product in history. They have amazing brand recognition, and beyond the toys, they have successful video games and movies.

According to my local news outlet, they’re up 12% in revenue growth in the last year (which outpaces the rest of the toy industry) and up 1,200% since 2004.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: