The problem is there isn't always 2 sides to a story. Sometimes there is one, sometimes there are multiple. If one side says it is raining, one side says it is not, the journalist should stick their hand out the window, not report the two sides.
Very few news articles are this cut and dried. EG for reporting on an earthquake, fair enough.
However, describing something more contentious like the economy or immigration policy, they absolutely should make a good faith effort to report both sides fairly.
Another way to look at this... not every natzi personally committed crimes. I would suspect that far less than 50% personally murdered anyone. But they were part of an organization that murdered millions, and did nothing to stop it. That makes them complicit.
I have tried virtually every ssri. They all make me extremely tired, too tired to function. But still would encourage people with anxiety to try them as there are very few other good options.
As someone with bad anxiety and who gets panic attacks in roughly one third of panels, it does feel fairly discriminatory.
The best interview I had was when they asked me a whiteboarding question, gave me a pencil and paper, and left the room. I solved it, they came back, and we talked about my solution. They still got to hear my thought process.
