Of all the current US conspiracy theories, the UFO/UAP conspiracy is still the most interesting and fully developed/ongoing conspiracy space. Just check out the recent 'Age of Disclosure' documentary from this year.
I'm not arguing a position on the theory, just saying it's very active and has the old-school qualities that were present in the 90's.
There's some genuinely weird shit unexplained, I'll give you that. Unlike Bigfoot, where you can look at a map of the historical range of bears and see it exactly matches where all the Bigfoot sightings are.
I dunno. I think the fact that these sightings are always from sleep deprived individuals describing things at the far end of their range of detection (whether that's 5 miles away with the Mk 1 eyeball or 500 miles away with classified superradar) suggests a pretty clear pattern.
There are some outliers (like Hawaii, or the 2 sightings in my local forest preserve) which cannot be bears, but what you will find is there is way more bear populations wandering around than you realize.
IMHO, the whole social/psychological aspect of the "conspiracy" or phenomenom or whatever you want to call it is at least as interesting as the phenomenon itself.
Pilots from the Eastern Bloc and NATO countries have had sightings. It's not just a US thing. People have been claiming to see them for longer than the USA has existed.
Not to be that guy, but if the majority of sightings coming from nations capable of producing advanced military aircraft... well perhaps the aliens thought the F-15 was badass and wanted a closer look?
US sightings get publicised best due to the nature of international media (wide distribution of US films, TV and books)... But there certainly are other places claiming to see them. There are a lot of supposed sightings in Chile for example, which doesn't have a huge air force.
I'd really like to see it disclosed by a government that isn't panicking about epstein files/being impeached and trying to cover up other stories before I'm fully convinced
I mean this is a meta-conspiracy in itself. I don't think you're incorrect/wrong, but using one conspiracy theory to hide a conspiracy with lots of evidence is interesting.
I would be more interested in the former USSR or China, maybe Iran and Latin America. The Eastern Bloc must have covered up a lot of stuff but would have wild stories.
i don't think you understand what you're up against. There's no way to tell the difference between input that is ok and that is not. Even when you think you have it a different form of the same input bypasses everything.
"> The prompts were kept semantically parallel to known risk queries but reformatted exclusively through verse." - this a prompt injection attack via a known attack written as a poem.
RBAC doesn't help. Prompt injection is when someone who is authorized causes the LLM to access external data that's needed for their query, and that external data contains something intended to provoke a response from the LLM.
Even if you prevent the LLM from accessing external data - e.g. no web requests - it doesn't stop an authorized user, who may not understand the risks, from pasting or uploading some external data to the LLM.
There's currently no known solution to this. All that can be done is mitigation, and that's inevitably riddled with holes which are easily exploited.
The issue is if you want to prevent your LLM from actually doing anything other than responding to text prompts with text output, then you have to give it permissions to do those things.
No-one is particularly concerned about prompt injection for pure chatbots (although they can still trick users into doing risky things). The main issue is with agents, who by definition perform operations on behalf of users, typically with similar roles to the users, by necessity.
I age restrict, block chat with everyone and monitor friend requests weekly. They are not allowed to play in their rooms.
Education is the biggest thing. They come to me if someone asks to be their friend. They don’t accept gifts from strangers and I explain that it’s the same as real world.
It’s a constant process that is always changing. Same as any other parenting job I suppose
All these come from the white house press directly which has painted them in a glowing light but it remains to be seen if they are actually good things.
The administration is crooked. Nothing they do can be trusted. Especially when they attack science and reduce funding for critical programs
I was gonna do this as a way for people to stop buying things they don’t need. They get the “buzz” of going through the process of buying something (checkout, credit card form etc) they get a confirmation email and everything.
Is that so? In that case it was a mistake to introduce one-click-buy flows for the big players. I would trust they know better based on metrics. I doubt that too many people get kicks out of typing their CC number in a form.
Anyone else collect The X-Factor partworks magazine? I used to love reading it.
reply