It's funny because Facebook and these social networks are always testing in Australia and New Zealand because it's a whole English-speaking society but it's a bit isolated and far away.

Though rescuers did consciously choose that role and that they’d be saving ignorant people very often

Doesn’t mean you need to add more opportunities for people to get hurt or killed when you know better.

I wonder if, if you'd talk to a rescuer, they'd agree...

source: i worked on an ambulance

Heh well, that's a good source. Any idea if all your colleagues thought the same?

Just add a stick and sharing: the scooters are quite successful

I never said they weren't successful.

Helsinki made a major push to reduce cars to get to Vision Zero and succeeded in no car fatalities in 2024. It’s now hard to get a taxi and you’re expected to walk / other transport it’s a little bit annoying but worth it

JECMAScript

Zoom also did this once

They also paid me something around 100 dollars in settlement for this

They don't care about security at all.

They once shipped a backdoor in their macOS app. It was noticed and called out and they refused to remove it. It took Apple blacklisting it for Zoom to finally take action.

I believe they now have a proper e2ee mode which disables all the cloud powered features, no?

They aquihired (and gutted) keybase for this, but I have a doubt that their "reimplementation" is actually E2EE.

My project https://hangout.fm/ does this based on turntable.fm and its legal and licensed and pays artists

I feel the two feel very different in their initial onboarding. OP's project comes across as a quick tool that just "works," while hangout.fm feels like a bigger commitment, moving away from a mini tech tool and being a music-oriented project which can feel intimidating for people that aren't really knowledgeable in the music sphere.

Some people worked on this. They don’t train on it directly. They use AI to rewrite the content “privacy-safe” then train on that….

Do you have any kind of source for that, or did you just make it up? If the latter, why?

That sounds very "privacy safe" ...

And then also to all code made from the GPL’d ai model?

A program's output is likely not owned by the program's authors. For example, if you create a document with Microsoft Word, you are the one who owns it, not Microsoft.

Unless the license says otherwise. The fact that Word doesn't (I wouldn't even be sure if that was true, honestly, especially for the online versions) doesn't mean anything.

They could start selling a version of Word tomorrow that gives them the right to train from everything you type on your entire computer into any program. Or that requires you to relinquish your rights to your writing and to license it back from Microsoft, and to only be able to dispute this through arbitration. They could add a morals clause.

> They could start selling a version of Word tomorrow ...

they could, but would anyone agree to this new eula? If they did, then what's the problem?

You sure about that? Have you checked the 400-page EULA?

If I take a song and convert it from .mp3 to .ogg, the resulting file has no copyright since it's the output of a program?

The cars have way way more negative externalities