Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | kkotak's commentslogin

Yes and it stands for the Department of War now.

I see you're being down voted, Reddit style. But you're on the mark about the hate tone of comments. If you don't like Amplifier, don't use it. No need to spew hate.


That was great share. Thank you.


Nope. Unfortunately he has veered to far into political slant for everything. Mostly towards the right.


Yeah I stopped listening to him when Covid started and he started spewing misinformation despite having seemingly zero understanding about medicine or biology.


In the US, the only way to generate passive wealth is through homeownership for most people. Others know how to invest and manage their portfolio actively.


Ok.


Why?


I wonder if multiple simulations show any level of convergence.


They should do this experiment in space.


Excellent idea! Also this whole experiment is really exciting. I'd heard of quantum entanglement being demonstrated with larger objects, but this is the first I've heard of measuring gravity between small objects. It seems like this must eventually lead to quantum gravity, or. . . something else!


The issue is that gravity and quantum mechanics contradict each other only when the curvature of spacetime is significant, which is not the case here. Still, it would be amazing to measure gravitational field from an entangled object... But I do not expect to see this during my natural lifetime.


I believe QM and GR contradict each other for any curvature, but measuring the extremely small curvature/gravitational effects caused by a single particle would require enormous amounts of energy. Specifically the problem is the way that the uncertainty principle interacts with GR's assumptions.


In flat space time you have QFT, which does not have severe problems until you make the gravitational fields very strong.


Isn't QFT limited to 0 (or otherwise negligible) gravitational interaction between particles/space-time?


I don't believe that is true. For example, if this experiment can be carried out with much smaller masses, they could find that the attractive force isn't smooth but is instead stair-stepped, which would imply some kind of quantization in space or gravity.


Nope. There is Tesla and there's Therasense.


Is Therasense == Theranos?

A google search returns a lot of stuff on patent litigation but no "human readable" articles


check out the coldfusion video ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CccfnRpPtM ). truly another Enron


Thanks- I knew about Theranos, just had no memory of the term "Therasense". And googling the term didn't make the connection clear at fisrt sight, so I asked


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: