Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | karohalik's commentslogin

UX & Content Designer | 10+ Years of Experience | Remote & Hybrid Positions

Location: Lisbon, Portugal (EU)

Remote: Yes, any timezone

Willing to relocate: Yes, within EU & SEA; willing to travel

Technologies: UX & Product [Figma, Miro, Adobe Creative Cloud], Content & Strategy [Adobe Experience Manager, WordPress, Ghost CMS, Webflow, Canva, Notion]; Marketing & Analytics [Google Analytics, Adobe Analytics, Semrush, Hotjar, Meta Business Manager, Klaviyo, GetResponse, Mailchimp]; Community Building [Discord, Slack]

Résumé: https://linktr.ee/karohalik_designer

Email: [email protected]


Yeah, I’ve been noticing the same. But let’s be honest, most people don’t really get to choose their relationship with tech. The whole analog tech and minimal phone thing sounds nice, but it’s still a luxury. You need a certain level of stability to even consider disengaging. So while I’m hopeful and happy to see those small changes, I’m also skeptical. Real change won’t happen until it stops being a lifestyle choice and becomes a bigger shift (or its part).


I'm calling it right now. Develop world costumers are increasingly seeing smartphones as limiting rather than empowering. It will shift into a product for areas with poor infrastructure as higher income push back against this invasive and manipulative technology. This will create a feedback loop. Lower average income will drive down the utility of the platform for those who fund it (advertisers), smartphones will gradually lose their status signalling value and in another generation it will be prevalent only in areas with poor infrastructure.


I suspect that you're right, but only because of the rise in AI.

At a certain point we'll all have AI personal assistants that are easier to use, more convenient, and less harmful to us than smartphones have historically been. The cool kids will move to the shinier new format, and the poor will continue to use the moderately dangerous, addictive, less efficient legacy tech for a long while.

Maybe these things will come in smart glasses format that we interact with primarily by voice, better smart watches that don't require a phone at all, or maybe it will be something like the star trek communicator?


I get that he didn’t say that here, but I’ve seen other replies leaning toward the idea that “it’s easy if you just try hard enough” and that’s what I was addressing, too.


I am talking about my psychiatrist. I think you are responding to the wrong person.


I think you're oversimplifying ADHD and its impact. It's not just a matter of using tools or strategies. ADHD exists on a spectrum, and it's often comorbid with other conditions like anxiety, autism, or depression. What works for one person might completely fail for another, especially if their challenges are layered or more severe.

Also, saying “regardless of diagnosis” is invalidating the real need for accommodations. People with ADHD often require not just personal effort, but systemic support, whether that’s in school, work, or healthcare.


Did this person ask for the advice? Also, treating children without empathy, like objects, is not the solution to the problem.


Demonstrating empathy is great but it's not a valid reason to tolerate misbehavior. And being on time for school is more important.


No one is saying that structure or boundaries aren’t important. Of course they are. But what is being challenged here is the assumption that a meltdown = misbehavior. Sometimes it is. But often what looks like “acting out” is actually communication. Discomfort, overstimulation, unmet needs, not manipulation.

Teaching kids discipline without empathy doesn't create resilience. It creates shame, masking, and fear of expressing emotions. And yeah, being on time matters. But so does understanding why the kid is melting down in the first place, especially if it’s a recurring thing. Otherwise, you’re just dragging a panicked, overwhelmed human out the door like a bag of potatoes and calling it a parenting win.


Yes, we should be cautious about tools shaping the way we think. But I’d argue that blaming Figma for narrowing the design process is like blaming Photoshop for bad photo editing. It's not the tool, it's how we use it.


UX & Content Designer | 10+ Years of Experience | Remote & Hybrid Positions

Location: Lisbon, Portugal (EU)

Remote: Yes, any timezone

Willing to relocate: Yes, within EU & SEA; willing to travel

Résumé: https://linktr.ee/karohalik_designer

Email: [email protected]

___

Hi, I’m Karolina. I design things people actually want to click – not because they’re nudged or tricked, but because they feel seen and understood.

I’ve worked across tech, travel, and e-commerce blending UX design, content strategy, and community building to shape digital experiences that are clear, inclusive, and human.

I'm currently open to new collaborations. That said, if you're building something useful, and ethical – I’d love to chat.

In the meantime, I’m also building my own project around neurodiversity and ethical tech, and documenting the process in my portfolio – https://linktr.ee/karohalik_designer. Feel free to follow along or say hi!


Location: Lisbon, Portugal (EU)

Remote: Yes, any timezone

Willing to relocate: Yes, within EU & SEA; willing to travel

Résumé & Portfolio: https://karohalikpl.notion.site/Hi-I-m-Karolina-18ad95547962...

Email: [email protected]

___

Hi, I’m Karolina. I design things that people actually want to click — not because they’re tricked into it, but because they feel seen and understood.

For over a decade, I’ve worked across tech, travel, and e-commerce — blending UX design, content strategy, and community building to help teams create digital experiences that are clear, useful, and genuinely human.

Sometimes that means building a scalable content system. Sometimes it’s rewriting a single CTA that finally converts. It’s always about designing with care and intent.

I’m looking for my next collaboration — ideally something at the intersection of UX, content, and product areas. If you’re building something useful, ethical, and kind — even if it just loosely touches on my skills or interests — let’s talk.


It seems like one is stuck in the past for good (well, the author and the book I suppose).


It’s kind of ironic that Nielsen’s site and even his book layouts were often frustrating to use. But maybe that proves his own points.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: