Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jbrande's commentslogin

Raw skill. Pedigree is a positive indicator but not defining criteria.


Axon.io | Seattle | Onsite | FTE Looking for: -Backend

    -Full Stack

    -Web Dev

    -Android

    -iOS

    -DevOps
We develop wearable cameras and software services for law enforcement to encode, ingest, encrypt, process (facial recognition/transcription/etc) and allow users to manage and interact with their data all at scale. Contact Email: jbrande@taser.com


Axon.io | Seattle | Onsite | FTE

Looking for:

    -Backend

    -Full Stack

    -Web Dev

    -Android

    -iOS

    -DevOps
We develop wearable cameras and software services for law enforcement to encode, ingest, encrypt, process (facial recognition/transcription/etc) and allow users to manage and interact with their data all at scale.

Contact Email: jbrande@taser.com


I do not know what you do in the gym but the delta between resting and lifting seems way too high for lifting and even a moderate warm up.


100% agree, this is why I doubt the number. I'm moving more, since I'm not in the house, and I'm walking around the city and taking the bus.

No warmups, just straight lifting weights (bench press, deadlifts, squats, plus a few accessory exercises), and stretching.

There is the delayed caloric burn that occurs from weight lifting, but I doubt the Fitbit is accounting for that.


I like the increasing focus on climate change but what about any one of of the other really damaging things we are doing? Acid Mine drainage, for one, is heavily related to the tech world with the ever growing demand for more materials to build our hardware.

Let's figure out how to build electronics & devices in a manner that enables systemic recycling and has more reasonable power costs. As it is, we just bury our old tech under a pile of trash and go mine some more. That is not a sustainable or in my opinion, sane, practice.


Environmental 'solutions' have the unfortunate habit of being severely under researched and causing further, if not greater, damage.

Besides, that is a solution for the symptom, not the disease.


When you have treated all symptoms and stopped them from arising again, the disease is effectively cured even if you still carry it. The final solution will be complete mastery over our planetary weather, it's better we do that sooner than later. Tsunami and earthquake deaths total far above terrorism deaths, we only need funding to fight terrorism to the extent that they get in the way of building to that final solution. Even if we "fix" the climate change disease (say perhaps by wiping out industrial-era and beyond humanity, the disease?) those other natural phenomena will still be killing many.


You are vastly, VASTLY, overestimating our understanding of the biology, chemistry, geology, & incredibly complex web of interdependencies and relationships that make up the environment we live in.

Much simpler to solve at the source (whatever actions are directly causing the damage) than the falacy of thinking we understand and have accounted for every possible permutation of events that will cascade after dumping material A into resource B. We don't even know what we don't know but this is the end game and mistakes here don't get do overs.

The next step in your logic is our 'traditional' response at this point: drop in another chemical/process that is supposed to 'fix' whatever mess up we did before. Haven't we learned from that yet, Deepwater Horizon was just the most recent example.


No, I recognize it's a hard problem, that's why we should be devoting significant resources to doing things now.

I get the point about unintended consequences with cascading problems (and cascading solutions to the new problems) (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2743879) but the odds of screwing up here are much less than screwing up on AGI, whose work has already significantly started and may be completed first anyway making this whole discussion moot. Geoengineering is risky, but it's not as risky as other things, including inaction, which as the status quo guarantees loss of thousands of lives. Even if the climate change alarmists' greatest fears come true we still easily have 50 years to try things on smaller scales before time is up. Anyway I think it's a lot more feasible for a strong nation to lead a technological solution than to convince all strong nations to curb their development. Call it a plan B if you must, but at some point I expect climate change alarmists are going to say something like "China and Russia and India aren't playing ball hard enough, their emissions are still causing global warming that will end humanity in x years unless they immediately reduce to the levels of the USA and the EU whose combined efforts bought us y years but it's still not enough, so it's time for war to make them."


It is indeed under-researched, so it should be researched. The fact that nobody is working on it at all is insane.


Seattle | Onsite | Mid & Senior Engineers

Evidence.com

Visa Sponsorship available

/* We're changing the way law enforcement uses technology. Our mission is to protect life and truth, making the world a safer place through smart devices and software services. We need brains and passion to make it happen. */

Roles:

iOS - from low level bluetooth to interface

Back End - Facial Recognition, Data Processing, encryption @ scale, more

Firmware - RTOS & Linux

DevOps - Build automation for varied/complex operations

Android

Front End

//contact if interested: jbrande[at]taser.com


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: