So far yes, but we should be able to in principle for a few kinds of problems.

He had first hand direct information about that stuff. Not true about motors. I believed him 100% about EPO but the motor stuff is silly. they check for motors for over a decade now.

> I believed him 100% about EPO but the motor stuff is silly. they check for motors for over a decade now.

If it's silly then why are they trying to counter it for over a decade?

Because where there are no checks there are the cheaters.

Example: there is no antidoping in amateur races. Amateurs dope themselves to win those races.

> Because where there are no checks there are the cheaters.

Were there any instances where people cheated in spite of testing, and were undetected for years?