Godot's high level networking is so nice because it's easy to do either.
Since everything in Godot is nodes, you can assign "ownership" of nodes to peers. Every peer has full control over their nodes and then you sync the data via RPC.
That way, you can do authoritative by just giving all the ownerships to the server node, or p2p by sharing which nodes belong to who.
In the context of drawing though, yeah if you want people to mess with other people's strokes it becomes annoying.
A common use case, how to do random thing in programming:
I searched python make a bar chart and it returned a live coding video with an AI generated text transcript and two articles which mentioned a different kind of bar.
So for what I imagine to be a difficult search because of all the different meanings of the words, I found my result on the second query pretty quickly, and found some cool unrelated stuff too.
I like mostly that I get what I type in, and not exactly what I want, but what I want is there too.
I would probably use this if I wanted to find interesting blog posts/websites about a topic I want to learn more about in general. It seems less useful for returning exact answers to specific questions.
Seems like there's a probably reasonable trend of piling some other tool on top of the stack because dealing with underlying layers is hard. Like electron apps and docker images. Or just web browsers.
Kind of worrisome to abandon lower layers with their problems and build on top of them, but what can you do, but get good at jenga.
Does anyone know anything about japenese office culture that might be relevant to this? Maybe part of the SV culture like open offices makes this a whole different deal then how japan is.
Open offices and micromanagement are the default in Japan, we didn't invent them. It's actually a lot worse there because the culture is much more intense and yet the pay is low.
I tried to ask it a bunch of existensial questions. I think the folks at OpenAI have hard-coded certain scenarios into the code. Purely speculating of course.
Because it's easier to harvest free oxygen on land. So since we have land, free-oxygen harvesters live there. Then they turn around and eat anything close to the surface that could evolve into a land-equivalent. But on an all-water planet, the putative bio-land makers would not have to compete with actual land-dwelling creatures because there wouldn't be any.
[UPDATE] Just to be clear: there's obviously no way to know whether this would happen. I'm only arguing that it could happen, and so lack of land is not necessarily a show-stopper for industrial civilization to emerge.
