Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | indigodaddy's commentslogin

Bruce is 76

The TLS termination isn't actually on the VPS. The article details that Tierhive has an haproxy edge service (handling the TLS), that then has the vps as the backend, but that vps is just doing tcp proxying with socat to the ddns exposed home server fqdn. Feels like a lot of unnecessary loops. Kinda fun I guess but, just, why

Not disagreeing with you, but that makes it even worse.

Agreed

Yes it is, "we plan to use our external VPS for handling the TLS termination". Edit: Ah I see you are just pointing out termination is on haproxy service not VPS. Thought you were implying it was terminating on pi, my apologies.

The VPS is running socat only and just doing tcp forwarding. There is a shared haproxy also run by their same host, sitting in front of the VPS and is handling the TLS. I encourage you to read the article fully. They probably should have said "VPS provider" instead of VPS for the TLS bit.

But it's plain text like you said in another comment after the haproxy, so two more plain text paths (with at least one going through the internet (vps->pi), not sure if haproxy->VPS is internal to the provider network (maybe)), so not ideal in my book

It's likely being flagged because people believe it's more AI-written than not

Let me copy paste my other comment:

"This is getting really fucking irritating. Every 3rd comment on every HN post is "This is LLM", which has become a proxy for "I dont like it so it must be llm"


Yeah, I suppose I am in the minority here, but I still judge a posts on their merits.

LLM witch hunts are tiresome.

(Perhaps the worst part too is that an accusation can be leveled and there's no way to counter. If it's a vacuous fluff piece, say so—irregardless of who/how it was written. And there we are judging a piece on its merits…)


Yeah I didn't flag it myself. I skimmed it and I didn't get an immediate AI vibe, like someone else said it seemed to be trying to use the motherf*in website style

Unlike witches, LLM content exists. And worse, it has proliferated to a point where you are more likely to spot LLM content in the wild then human written content.

Witch hunts are bad because they target innocent people and burn them at the stake. When the whole internet has been filled with LLM content, it is not unreasonable, expected even, that you start accusing everything of being an LLM, because, most likely, it is.


This one has major signs of LLM speak, specifically Claude.

Normal humans who rant like, actually rant. This is AI generated rant.


Yeah it's taking itself a bit more seriously than an actual human would.

Doesn't Showstopper go into this a little bit? Been a while since I read it.

Wasn't familiar with this book but it looks interesting. It's about creating Windows NT.

ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0GD26T869

ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 979-8993755410


Is Anthropic profitable and/or profitability on the horizon?

You just shifted the goalpost a lot from the original comment that was being replied to. The answer of course, is no to the first, and 2nd is not really knowable. I'm not sure what that really demonstrates or what your point is.

How so that comment asked about profits

> when will this show up in revenue and profit numbers

This was the comment


They asked about revenue and profit, you ignored profits and focused on revenue, so I focused in on when will profits happen, one of the items OP wanted to know about. I don't see how it's an unreasonable follow-up?

Since about Jan of this year, yes

I mean, that's essentially what he's recreating here it looks like

Have you given any thought to a webui, and a "warp" server I can install on a VPS and interact with it via the webui? I believe this paradigm/approach is the real future.


This aligns nicely with today's/current GitHub Actions outage


Github outage? Must be a Y in the day


But the question remains


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: