I am surprised by all the answers saying 0 percent. I'd understand that if you use use it without any grounding or additional context. I am far faster with it, using one MCP server with docs and one for language specific features. If the code base is large enough, serena is a must have. I'd say about the same, groking an unknown code base is a lot faster, producing for something I am familiar with maybe 4-5x

Or they lower the bar for someone that wishes to pick up Linux for gaming but are not comfortable or able to massage the distro it is based on into something gaming-compatible.

This is how it should be done. Vendor lock-in can almost always be avoided with proper design

I basically live in the forest and get an unreasonable amount of leaves each autumn. Most of these leaves are also from oak and do not decompose well, leaving the lawn a mess in the spring. Using a rake is unreasonable for me, and a leaf blower saves me many, many hours each year that I can spend better elsewhere.

> Using a rake is unreasonable

Why though?

It's generally a lot quicker unless you're a very old person

It's however infinitely more fun with the leave blower, I admit to that!

If you can clear my driveway faster with a rake than I can with a leaf blower, you are a superb athlete. Like John Henry.

Did you try rakes like this?

https://www.joom.com/products/681aed59eda2b001310d4e2c

A better rake will help me outcompete a leaf blower as well as better shoes will help me outcompete a car.

I'll tried a leaf blower only once (it was when visiting family) and I raked every other autumn day as a kid. Leaf blower was... extremely painful to use, for me. It felt like it took me 2x more time to achieve what rake would do effortlessly.

But a lot of it was probably familiarity with rake and a lack of skill with leaf blower. I am sorry ready to believe that technology progressed enough that leaf blowers are now usable. I'd like to see how it feels with wet leafs though.

Obviously, I'm not you, but at my previous home I had a lot of pine trees (so needles rather than leaves, and lots of cones to remove as well) on a corner lot (so effectively two front yards). I also had a mulching lawn mower.

During the fall and winter, I would mow two or three times. The mulching blade made quick work of the detritus and it was faster and less work than raking the whole thing. I'm far enough south that snow, while possible, was still a novelty not guaranteed to happen every year.

Don't they state pretty clearly the actual harm that is occurring due to undermined privacy?

They make up their own definitive of harm that includes that. The article is about how the definition of harm the law uses, doesn't match how they would like to see it defined.

You do not understand how the law works, and you are making a fool of yourself.

They are in the middle of asking a court to clarify what the law means by the word "harm". That is not settled as yet. Things like that get settled by litigation. They are taking a position in such litigation.