next to dark blue text on a black background

"trapd00r" is the theme you want, if only because the name is cool

I change themes just often enough to completely forget how to do it and also forget whatever other adjustments I had to make to it all work. And like... is my config versioned somehow? This is a long way to say, Thank You for inspiring me to look at all that stuff again!

https://github.com/paperless-ngx/paperless-ngx / A community-supported supercharged document management system: scan, index and archive all your documents

It's a shame to see you get downvoted (presumably because you don't cite any evidence for your assertions). As a counter-point, I will give the oft-quoted-by-me 1990s promotional video of the use of IBM CallPath on an AS/400 which should get you all misty-eyed https://youtu.be/5pY6Xxptp9A?t=2058

Enjoy.

IBM = heathen technology. The entire point is fetishization of not that.

IBM it's a special case. You often have the exact tools under the terminal interface and the GUI 1:1. You can do the same task in the CLI, TUI or with a GUI, now it can perfectly be over a web. But for minimum latency the CLI and TUI are essential and even a 9front user as me I acknowedge that. But 9front it's a special case too; it was basically made to be modular from day one and you can just set a CPU server and connect anything into it over 9p, be physical or not. No SSH needed, everything works the same everywhere.

(this is all you ever do on this site) are you worried that it's now (out of date) given that it's now February? Was there something in your pancakes?

They are just being helpful

They're helping implement the policy. If you think the rules don't make sense, argue for changing them, don't criticize the people following them.

FWIW I think having (2025) for something 1 month ago in January, but nothing 11 months ago in December, doesn't really make much sense. I'd change it to add a year only for things at least a year old. But I barely think it's worth writing this paragraph about in a post I'm already writing for another reason. Definitely not worth giving someone else grief about.

There's no rule that you have to make a zero-value comment when you see an article from last year.

It's zero value to you, but it's not zero value to the mods (as evidenced by the fact that the title has been changed).

"I can't change the minds of the people running the site, but I can make life unpleasant for people who help them achieve their vision" is not an OK attitude to have.

If you have a message to the mods you are supposed to email them.

You can't appeal the rules because there's no governance process for it.

Unless dang or whatever makes a separate "Debate" section or similar. Ironically, a debate thread about the rules would violate the rules themselves. Well, unless you make it a rage blog post first...

why would you hedge yourself with a double-negative here? It was because of (open) protocols and not services that people could easily decamp and setup afresh.

Interoperability has always been paramount, but gets so easily forgotten.

his comment was more useful than yours

He made an account name called vrijen which is having sex in dutch.. as he himself explained. Not sure if you noticed that part

it's alright, the links are on the page

why? and why "quickly?

tell me mr armchair general, what have you done that's worth talking about?

My comment was not intended to be any criticism or to downplay the performance - quite the opposite :)

I did not take your original comment as critiscism. Feel free to follow the repository and see how long I can keep it alive :)

I think it is right to be skeptectial and I hope this project can prove people wrong.