You may find you get more value out of this project if you publish the source code - even if you do so not under an open source license.
Asking people to download and run an untrusted Windows executable is a major barrier to demonstrating your skills. I don't even have a Windows machine to hand to try it out on!
Showing the source code would give people a much better idea of what you can do.
If you're not willing to publish the source code (and that's a perfectly reasonable decision, it's your work!) I suggest creating a video that demonstrates the project.
Arc was re-written to Common Lisp (SBCL) around last year, for performance reasons.
> [Clarc] is much faster and also will easily let HN run on multiple cores. It’s been in the works for years, mainly because I rarely find time to work on it, but it’s all pretty close to done.
> there’s now an Arc-to-JS called Lilt, and an Arc-to-Common Lisp called Clarc. […]
> open-sourcing the Arc implementation (i.e. Clarc) would be much easier [than the HN site]. [Because…]
reply