This comment was replying to someone asking "how could engineers possibly write such malicious code" so a more glaring example from a more mainstream company seemed quite appropriate.
I love this write-up. As a non-expert user of package managers I can quickly understand a set of patterns that have been deeply considered and carefully articulated. Thanks for taking the time to write up your observations!
There's a cool effect where if you hold a fluorescent tube under a high voltage power line, capacitive coupling from the varying electric field causes it to light up. Some energy is continually leaking out via this route, the tube just reveals it. (Magnetic induction too)
You are obviously correct, but I don't know that it really matters.
As I see it, the movement is about pointing out that the most useless dumbest biggest failure of a mega corporation is actually great in light of their current practices.
Why does it matter whether they would have messed it up if they implemented it today?
Restated: the point is not that clippy is great. The point is that he sucked, and that he is great relative to what kinds of products Microsoft is creating today.
Bitcoin has features which make it uniquely appropriate for this: namely that no other currency is so resistant to debasement.
I anticipate it will recover and set new records.
reply