Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | eloisius's commentslogin

They could throw some small portion of their billions of dollars into proper quality control and reproduce it themselves if they wanted to. It’s an industry-wide malaise, but it isn’t inevitable. It’s amazing that every year it becomes more and more economically nonviable for basic shit to meet the most modest standards of usability, yet we can use the power consumption of a small country to have Copilot in Notepad.

It’s any interesting thread for sure, but while reading through this I couldn’t help but think that the point of these ideas are for a person to read and consider deeply. What is the point of having a machine do this “thinking” for us? The thinking is the point.

And that’s the problem with a lot of chatbot usage in the wild: it’s saving you from having to think about things where thinking about them is the point. E.g. hobby writing, homework, and personal correspondence. That’s obviously not the only usage, but it’s certainly the basis for some of the more common use cases, and I find that depressing as hell.

so consider them deeply. Why does the value diminish if discovered by a machine as long as the value is in the thinking?

I hiked Torres del Paine around 51 deg south about 12 years ago and the winds were no joke. On plains or in mountain passes it was absolutely howling. It felt like you could lean into it at a 60 deg angle and not fall over. Sometimes when the trail went close to a steep edge with nothing to break the wind I felt like I needed to crouch, ready to get on the ground, in case a gust caught me.

Yeah, I was expecting read something that made me mad, but this is basically how I’ve eaten my whole life. I’ve never subscribed to any special diet, but I like whole milk, I like eating meat and veggies, I don’t enjoy sliced bread, and I avoid sugary things. I walk a lot every day. Probably thanks to genetics, but I’ve been thin my whole life and the only chronic issues I’ve had tend to be muscle-tendon things from bad posture while sitting at the computer, or overdoing it when I get into a hobby like bouldering. Near 40 and I hope I can keep my health and be active well into my 70s at least.

I doubt it. I don’t think anyone is spending $2k on Canon L-series (red ring) lenses based on the size. On the high end, photographers are pretty discerning about equipment’s capabilities. If they made my Canon EF 35mm f1.4L USM II half the size and weight I’d be thrilled.

The RF version of that lens is a bit lighter.

Not to be too rude, but this looks like a bunch of 2010-style procedural PHP string concatenation spaghetti. Data mappers and ORMs are pretty much a solved problem. Why write your own as part of your platform? If you’re writing this much boilerplate to reimplement solved problems, it’s no wonder you’re able to get a lot of help from an LLM.

Can you say anything about where you were five years ago? Or how your ability to write and ship code from 2015 to 2020 changed? It’s hard to believe all these 50x AI productivity claims, especially without an idea of what that multiplier applies to and what the right side of the equation even means. Is it lines written, dollar amounts of impact, pull requests merged?

Yes, you can follow my code from 5 and 10 years ago here:

https://github.com/Qbix/Platform-History-v1

https://github.com/Qbix/Platform-History-v2

And you can see the latest code here:

https://github.com/Qbix

Documentation can be created a lot faster, including for normies:

https://community.qbix.com/t/membership-plans-and-discounts/...

My favorite part of AI is red-teaming and finding bugs. Just copypaste diffs and ask it for regressions. Press it over and over until it can't find any.

Here is a speedrun from a few days ago:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yg6UFyIPYNY


And Zamyatin’s _We_ was even a few years earlier. Great artists steal.

Here is a link for people who don’t know about it (it’s not too obvious but “we” is the actual title): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_(novel)

Published in 1924, it’s a short read, I would recommend, I personally find it more compelling than Orwell’s work


It's not just that, it's that the topic was extremely actual. Between the Russian Revolution and the general state of European countries at the beginning of the XX century, a lot of intellectuals were working hard on the concepts of "fully rational" societies, fair governance, social efficiency, just social order, and so on.

Somewhat ironically, what seems to have survived in the public consciousness is actually the critique of all those efforts (1984, We, etc). The Western mainstream seems to have abandoned any attempt to create a rational, enduring order from social chaos. Somehow we just accepted that things are fucked up and there is no hope of meaningfully unfuck them.


Those attempts inevitably resulted in fascist dystopias (just look at past and today dictatorships), so critiques of them were and are very on point.

Positive examples that went in other directions, like Huliaipole anarchistic Free Territories didn't survive for long.


I was disappointed to learn that even after subscribing to the Atlantic (print and digital, aka the premium tier) that popups don’t stop. They now nag me on every visit to spend even more money to buy a subscription as a gift for someone else. Pretty sure when my subscription lapses next year I’ll just go back to reading their site via archive.is. These companies can’t help but make piracy a better experience than even the most expensive subscription they offer.

At the very least, art usually contains effort signifiers. Yes, an artist could potentially employ gingerbread men cut from construction paper in a work, but no, construction paper gingerbread men are typically not in the same league as David.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: