He has a point. Good water pressure us underrated.

They're FDA approved drugs, so it's a matter of when they're covered by any given prison's health plan. They're unlikely to be given off-label, But there's probably plenty of prisoners on GLPs at least for diabetes if not weight control.

Authors often have little input on the headline or title of an article or book. When a publisher focuses on one-off readership instead of longtime readers, they tend to use whatever headline grabs the most attention.

This article was self published seemingly. And book titles are negotiated by authors and publishers commonly.

The is the first fatality for the company operating the jet, since 1970. They have over 800 aircraft and operate at hundreds of thousands of flight hours per year.

The crash rate for people flying their own jet by themselves is extremely high. For those who let a professional fly, the crash rate is very low.

> For those who let a professional fly, the crash rate is very low.

But still much higher on the private plane side than the commercial side, even if its a hired pilot.

Much less than CloudFlare and others try to block me from, because they think my use of a privacy-focused web browser means I'm scraping the site.

The worst part of LLMs isn't that their output fills up web pages, it's that web hosts realized they can sell web content to train LLMs, so they're reticent to let it be used for its original purpose.

I'm pretty confident that my accidental click rate is much higher than one in 476, especially on touch screens, although you'd need to divide that by the total number of links on the page, to get the probability of accidentally clicking on any specific link.

It depends on whether or not the page finishes loading, and rearranges everything, right as you're trying to click on a link.

Revolutions have been fought over the freedom to act without constant surveillance. The obviousness and enormity of a need for privacy is well established.

To be even more specific (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S01401...) heavy use of social media by children has been shown to correlate with reduced life satisfaction, but moderate use has no correlation with any effect on children. There isn't even any good research showing causation, just correlation, so prohibitions on children using social media will have absolutely no effect on most children, and for the rest there's a possibly of a benefit but also a possibility that there is no benefit, and a symptom of something larger is no longer visible.

That's a pretty small gain, in exchange for requiring everyone to give in to constant surveillance.