One of the many reasons to visit Pembrokeshire, Wales:

https://www.internalfire.com/

Lots of running kit you can get close to or hands on with e.g. 4000hp jet generators, telephone exchanges, steam engines etc. plus knowledgeable and passionate staff.

Well worth a couple of hours detour to check out.

Yes, but even the best agency will every so often run into a bad client. I think that's analogous to what happened here.

Appear Here | London, United Kingdom | ONSITE | FULLTIME

Ruby/Rails React/Redux IOS Android Redis/PostgreSQL/Elasticsearch AWS/Docker

https://www.appearhere.co.uk?hn is the UK’s leading marketplace for commercial letting. Our platform allows anyone with an idea to book everything from pop ups through to prime Oxford Street locations. It’s been called AirBnB for brands, and our vision is to make it as easy to book a shop as it is to book a hotel room. A surprisingly huge market, and it's in our hands to become the world's leading marketplace.

You’d be part of a small team that is taking Appear Here worldwide, onto new platforms, and deep into masses of valuable data. It's an energetic, committed, challenging, and sane culture. Plus we're a stone's throw from the best lunchtime options in London.

dave+hn@appearhere.co.uk

http://appearhere.workable.com/jobs/14626

This is essentially the same approach as https://github.com/snowplow/snowplow/wiki/Setting-up-the-Clo....

What's neat and novel to me about this implementation is the use of delimiters vastly simplifies loading the raw S3 logs into Redshift.

Here's a summary of the discussion (RAML vs Swagger vs Apiary vs RSpec...) we had at Lonely Planet: https://lonelyplanet.atlassian.net/wiki/display/PUB/API+Spec...

5 months in, we're happy with API Blueprint. We used to use Dredd for API validation but ran into to some limitations:

- Dredd does not perform any validation against the siren response beyond the first key level. For example, it does not validate if the class-name is user-events, or usr-events

- Dredd does not make any difference between Action parameters and Resource parameters. Then, an action POST to create user-events will have undesired url parameters. E.G: POST /user-events?take=0&skip=2 (The apib blueprint specs allows to make this difference: https://github.com/apiaryio/api-blueprint/blob/master/exampl...)

So one of our devs created a Ruby validator, https://github.com/nogates/vigia. See http://engineering.lonelyplanet.com/2014/11/18/vigia-integra... if you're interested.

Hi, I'm Dredd developer and here are my comments on Dredd - API Blueprint testing tool:

- Dredd does not perform any validation against the siren response beyond the first key level. For example, it does not validate if the class-name is user-events, or usr-events

This I can't confirm, presence of object keys is validated on any level.

- Dredd does not make any difference between Action parameters and Resource parameters. Then, an action POST to create user-events will have undesired url parameters. E.G: POST /user-events?take=0&skip=2

This is true, but it’s by design. In Dredd URI parameters are inherited from resource to action, but there is no way how to filter out unwanted parameters from resource under action section.

In this case I assume that `skip` and `take` parameters belong only to GET action (retrieving collection), so its imho a non-sense to discuss them on the resource level because they will be propagated to any action under that resource.

Thank you for very interesting feedback!

What do you mean by "brand name tests"?

Or well-known URIs http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5785

> marked incompatible with nexus 7

FWIW works perfectly on my 2nd-gen Nexus 7.

Not with 1st gen :(

See also Wong Kei's in London's Chinatown. Its notorious rudeness is/was part of the attraction.

http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/wordofmouth/2014/feb...

    1. Start scraping all images from http://developer.android.com/training/ inside div.gc-documentation    
    2. Inspect manually
    3. Profit

Fun!