This is a v0.1 draft protocol for letting users own the derived claims AI systems make about them, rather than the platform that derived them. There's an in-development Rust reference implementation alongside it (in private, not yet public).
Would value feedback, particularly from anyone who's worked on Solid, AT Protocol, Iroh, or the Willow Protocol. The comparison chapter in the spec walks through how this relates to each. Willow in particular has real overlap and I tried to be honest about that.
Brilliant. If you needed proof the internet is still alive, here you go. I feel like Neal's creations are the result of creatively iterating on "what if" and "why not".
Solid analysis, these quotes were particularly damning imo:
"You don’t accidentally forget to disclose that your memory is split into two non-unified pools. That’s a deliberate omission of the single most important architectural limitation of the device."
"Read that filename. layer_27_36. That’s not dynamic hot neuron routing, that’s static layer assignment"
this is how i got my start in programming, eventually leading to working in finance and now in gamedev for a AAA. many of the programmers i worked with as a teenager to build neopets automations are in similar places. i have so many stories and even met my ex wife of ten years through the community!
oh and i regret all the duping glitches i found and exposed and stuff im sorry
Would value feedback, particularly from anyone who's worked on Solid, AT Protocol, Iroh, or the Willow Protocol. The comparison chapter in the spec walks through how this relates to each. Willow in particular has real overlap and I tried to be honest about that.
reply