Could that bring archive.org in trouble with the content owners?

personally, I don't think so. The link itself is actually a static website which anyone can host combined with piping server (actually I recommend doing so if someone wishes to also use my project to host it on their own github pages)

If Archive.org has any trouble with content owners, then archive.org has a proper mechanism iirc if content owners wish to remove the content.

Currently, only I use this myself to share links of archive.(is|ph|today etc) which people share on hackernews, and I convert it to archive.org

Personally I made this project because I was a bit sick of captchas and I saw many people who couldn't access archive.is or who were hesitant to do so, so I decided to made it.

Edit: that being said, I am not a lawyer and I am more than happy to help anybody/everybody interested

They payoff is, you know you are not the reason why the people who pressed the blue button died.

Blue risk their lives to safe others, red safe themselves.

Blue won’t get survivor’s guilt

Just look how MS try to get rid of

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47881805

Where is the big to what we have now?

Not much more freedom, but the control is outside voters reach.

Just ask Nicolas Guillou

> A simple solution is just not providing your kids with a phone or computer.

That’s not a solution. Nowadays many schools require access to a computer.

Putting the computer in a common room addresses this case as they have access but the public space adds a level of restraint.

They require access to computers at home because the teachers send the homework per web platform.

Also the class schedule including the substitutes are communicated per smartphone app

These schools, at least here where I am in Europe, have to provide their pupils with devices. How else would it be fair?

Yes the bigger problem is those schools often provide them with chromebooks with are mass surveilance devices in disguise :'(

At least Lego‘s patent on the bricks expired. You can’t make mini figures but bricks shouldn’t be a problem

Well done indeed

I hope that Lego (not lawyers ofc) would appreciate such creativity approach and hire creators. (E.g. similar to acquihire of OpenClaw creator by OpenAI.)

How many of us do think this way?

I am always jealous (in good way) when I see similar projects.

Indeed Amazon is chock full of shitty Chinese Lego ripoffs. The bricks do indeed fit together but the quality is abysmal.

Some of the Chinese brands have superior quality to LEGO these days.

Partly because the chinese produce the plastic that Lego use.

Jevon‘s paradox comes into play.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox

In the end only profit matters

Let's use new technology just because it's new.

You see how ridiculous that sounds

There is a difference between figuring out and already knowing. Especially if time is a limiting factor