Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | cbmuser's commentslogin

> All travellers and myself had to look for Ubers, which the government also tries to suppress.

No one is trying to suppress Uber. They are just obligated to adhere to the law like anyone else in this business.


Debian's RISC-V machines are rather slow.

It takes several days to build the gcc-15 package in riscv64 but just a few hours on loong64.


Yup. Their best builders run JH7110 (based on the in-order SiFive U74 cpu, RVA20 + partial B) and these are slow, somewhere between rpi3 and rpi4.

This will improve in 2026, with the first chips integrating RVA23 microarchitectures, such as the Tenstorrent Atlantis SoC and development board, with Ascalon, announced for 2026Q2.


I actually bootstrapped openSUSE for loongarch64 last year:

https://hackweek.opensuse.org/projects/bootstrap-opensuse-on...


> Huh. Is this arch supported by LLVM/Rust?

Yes.

> It was announced recently (https://lwn.net/Articles/1044496/) that Apt, the Debian package manager, would require Rust by May 2026.

No, that was just the wish expressed by one of the APT maintainers. No actual decision has been made yet.


> Actually Alpine had support for LoongArch64 well before Debian.

Nah, we added the loong64 in Debian already in 2023:

https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/08/msg00...

It was just promoted to being a release architecture.


> What I've always found off-putting about the Debian packaging system is that the source lives with the packaging.

Many packages have stopped shipping the whole source and just keep the debian directory in Git.

Notable examples are

- gcc-*

- openjdk-*

- llvm-toolchain-*

and many more.


But isn't that incompatible with the proposed transition to Git?

You can buy LoongArch hardware on AliExpress, for example.

Always thought they’d ship me garbage. Not sure why. I’ve bought lots of stuff there. But I don’t know how to tell it’s not some rebadged Via chip before it arrives. Just the game, I suppose. To Aliexpress!

Buy from listings with many sales and good reviews.

Look for reviews with real images and real seeming phrases in many languages, not 10 accounts all posting the same phrase with no pictures.

Buy from stores with a name, preferably who have established a "brand" for themselves across many products. UGreen are a great example of this for USB gadgets.

Don't buy from stores named Shop195772040, these will take your money and disappear or ship fakes. Don't buy suspiciously cheap items with no sales, these will do the same.


Experiences can vary from seller to seller, but I've owned a few oddball motherboards from china that shouldn't exist. (old server cpu sockets shoved onto a Micro ATX Board) Any time I've had issues getting a refund took maybe a week or two at most. Although the last issue I had was a few VRM components exploding and throwing shrapnel all over inside the case. So buy at your own risk on some things.

I don't think LoongArch is the same thing with MIPS according to Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loongson

MIPS ist dead, so not much gain in keeping compatibility with it anymore.

> I don't think LoongArch is the same thing with MIPS according to Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loongson

Where did I make that claim? I never said that.


»It could be but the US and EU have so far been unable to build commercial fission reactors without going 2x+ over budget in time and money.«

The EU also forgot how to build airports and train stations on budget and on time.

Should we stop building airports and train stations?

As for nuclear power plants: Germany and France built most of their reactors on budget and on time.


50+ years ago, not relevant.


Wind and solar existed in the 70s as well.

Plus, Germany invested 500 billion Euros in its energy transition and is STILL heavily dependent on coal.


They’re at ~60% total power from renewables in 2025, and increasing every quarter. I’d say they’re doing pretty well! The coal is unfortunate, but was due to the Ukraine war and gas situation.


> Wind and solar existed in the 70s as well.

Not really. Solar has gone down in price almost 500X since 1975.

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/solar-pv-prices

Wind has gone down significantly too.

https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/54526.pdf

Meanwhile, the graph for nuclear waste disposal is going rapidly in the opposite direction.

https://www.ans.org/news/article-6587/us-spent-fuel-liabilit...

http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2024/ph240/kendall1/


> Wind and solar existed in the 70s as well.

This is basically nonsense to the extent that it is becoming difficult to extend the presumption of good faith to you. In the 70s solar panels cost US$25+ per peak watt, in 02021-adjusted dollars: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_energy#/media/File:Solar...

Now they cost 5.9¢ per peak watt: https://www.solarserver.de/photovoltaik-preis-pv-modul-preis...

Installing a gigawatt of solar power generation capacity for US$25 billion is in no way comparable to installing a gigawatt of solar power generation capacity for US$59 million.

Wind power has experienced a similar but less extreme cost decline.


»Your citation comes from an organization with pro nuclear bias.«

Go and throw all your money into renewables stocks and ETFs if you’re so convinced.

I bet you’re not doing that because you realize that the industry isn’t doing well and it’s nuclear power nowadays where all the money goes.


Personally, I've invested ~500k EUR in a Portuguese Golden Visa fund invested in renewables (IRR is ~7-13%). Macro speaking, renewables investments keep hitting new records. I am convinced, and if you are not, I would strongly suggest consuming more data, because you appear to have a potential blind spot in your mental model on this topic.

https://about.bnef.com/insights/clean-energy/global-renewabl...

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2025-10-28/white-...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: