Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | castis's commentslogin

We are not. These are embryo-like structures. Not actual human embryos.


they have no mouth even if they want to scream.


I'm an organ donor, and I have no problem giving my organs away after I'm quite positive I won't feel it. I think as long as there is no sensation, there is no pain, and certainly no formal concept of "self". But still, with matters of exploitation of our bodies, we should tread very very lightly.


that's an odd thing to bring up out of nowhere.


"Call them out, hell, call their employer" -JD Vance: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngofqx9EfcM&t=7398s

https://x.com/SecRubio/status/1967784061721776521 revoking visas


For the record, your website starts out "Our website has no flashy buttons, fancy graphics, eye-catching JavaScript animations, or stock photos with grinning people, and that is by design" and then your website goes on to have every single one of those things.


We detached this comment from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42303251. Please see the rules at the top of the thread.


> I could have surely done it for the good of mother earth but financially it made no sense.

This seems like a recurring theme in todays world.


Thank you for this. Its lovely to be reminded that a lot of us share some the same ups and downs whatever we're doing.


Interesting project, but the custom scroll behavior on the site is obnoxious. It makes navigating the site more difficult than it should be. Might be something to reconsider.


This person is not affiliated with Meta.


Looks like they work at Meta, but this is a scammy blind-referral submission scheme for them to refer random people to collect the $5k employee referral bonus. This is definitely discouraged.


Thanks for catching this. This is definitely not ok.


Is denouncing that which is not your personal brand of humor a substantial addition?


It’s not about my brand of humor, any comment that is just a quip is unsubstantial and against community guidelines here. What exactly is the point of your comment other than to try and make us more like Reddit, the website HN was designed to not be.


The irony in complaining about the guidelines, while dismissing the very last item. Classic.


Whats the problem with electric aviation?


Batteries are much heavier than fuel


That's part of the problem, as is the fact that batteries don't get lighter through the flight. The energy infrastructure on the ground is the thorny bit, though.


Getting enough energy into enough planes fast enough at enough airports to make a dent. As a guide to the order of magnitude of the problem, consider that a 747 needs roughly 100MW to stay airborne.


> Is it possible.

Using current technology we could probably make an object go faster than that so yes, it would be able to catch up.

However, we'd probably just put better instruments on this new object and make that the priority.


> Using current technology we could probably make an object go faster than that so yes, it would be able to catch up

We could achieve slightly greater speed immediately after launch but we wouldn't be able to exploit the planetary gravity assists that accelerated the Voyager spacecraft.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: