It's just the way it should be.

Yet, I did not see a single issue made on the GitHub repository, and I just made one myself (https://github.com/ollama/ollama/issues/8698).

It is not different from the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike license or the GNU General Public License v2+. It does not extend to content that is not derived this model.

makedeb, originally called Debian User Repository (DUR) is an AUR clone for Debian derivatives. Packages use the PKGBUILD format just as in Arch, and is mostly similar, but with changes such as use of package names based on Debian.

It also tries to support distribution specific changes, but I don't have much details on how effective it is. I don't use a Debian derivative system myself.

You cannot view the PKGBUILDs from the site, but you can clone the git repo which will contain just the PKGBUILD. The MPR subdomain and git clones seemed laggy to me, but it eventually loads (took about ~18s).

Hyfetch has LGBTQIA+ pride flags, but it has neowofetch which doesn't have them.

The owner just became a farmer in April 26

Those who fork are not kings, but are princes who become kings.

And even if you hate China, it does not justify the opposition to using an open source ISA as a whole. It benefits everyone around the globe, and USA is not a special country. Others can use the ISA just the same, and it's better for them to do so.

You guys thinking in terms of countries is just as big of a problem, but again I don't have the time for that philosophy.

Literally every open source RISC-V Chip, SoC and Board I know are Chinese, aside from SiFive. Alibaba T-Head Xuantie C9-series and E9-series CPU cores, StarFive JH7110 SoC, Alibaba T-Head TH1520 SoC, SOPHON SG2042 SoC, StarFive JH8100 SoC (TBA), several RISC-V boards from Milk-V, BananaPi and SiPeed which are state of the art RISC-V boards.

I think US are the ones doing less.

Edit: Just realized SiFive was US based, not Chinese, so edited it out.

I thought SiFive is actually one of the best though?

Espressif has a bunch of Risc-V designs too. Not high performance but easy to find and use.

Yes, but I'm only talking about Chinese ones here. And considering just the open source boards, as I did, SiFive only has their Freedom series chips and boards, and their contributions to the Rocket Chip project.

All the Chinese ones I listed are open source designs.

And the Chinese says thank you Uncle Sam for giving us RISC-V for free.

An open source ISA is a collaborative effort, and it contains several members, not just from the US. And it was inevitable either way. Going against who uses an open source an open source ISA is against open source, and going against open source is capitalist greed.

I won't be debating that, there are plenty of resources to read on it and it's a big topic if you are so deeply opposed to it.

I don't see the problem with using Anytype License instead of AGPL. AGPL allows commercial use as long as the source code is provided, while Anytype disallows commercial use. Other than that it is the same, and is "open source" regardless. As in, OSI doesn't trademark "open source".