Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | b40d-48b2-979e's commentslogin

    So I don't really follow the news
I feel like not knowing about the tariffs and your cost of living being on an exponential graph is more than "not following the news"? The administration is serious and causing harm to everyone it can.

It is certainly a privilege being an American right now and not having to worry about:

1) A rapidly growing economic crisis due to aggressive and inchorent foreign policy decisions

2) The new force of Gestapo murdering and harming citizens in cities all across the nation

A real privilege.


ICE isn't the Gestapo. The Gestapo didn't hide their faces.

If history is any guide, ICE may be better compared to the SA. Their job is to make it safe for the future Gestapo to operate unmasked... at which point the unprofessional street thugs in ICE will find that they've become a liability to the regime.


The Gestapo also didn't have smartphones recording their every action in public places being disseminated to the entire planet.

Note that Noem has already declared that any video evidence of ICE's criminal activity is itself illegal and inadmissible [1,2].

As I understand it, the right to record police has never actually been tried definitively at the SCOTUS level. The Republicans certainly have the tools on the SCOTUS bench to prohibit it now, so look for a case to be brought at some point.

1: https://reason.com/2026/01/08/you-have-the-right-to-record-i...

2: https://www.kqed.org/news/12070260/what-you-need-to-know-abo...


She says all kinds of stupid stuff. Nobody out in the real world should take that kind of statement seriously. Which school gave her that law degree?

Ah, the "They don't really mean it" school of thought. Thanks for your input.

    if they publish anything contrarian
Publishing something to the contrary of popular belief is not being contrarian. It is not a virtue to be contrarian and forcing a dichotomy for the sake of arguing with people.

Started going through it before work starts and I think I need to stop before I get too absorbed! I love their design and music decisions so far.

This is coming across to me as "things I don't like are 'politics'" if I'm being honest.

Hand-waving everything as "politics" is not healthy. It's necessary for us to be able to make collective decisions on societal questions which is what "politics" are.

I remembered when politics used to be called “current events”.

HN is the wrong forum for this.

This is what the biggest names in the VC class want you to think as they continue to enrich themselves, while (in the USA at least) they support a regime that is growing in its authoritarian output.

Thiel, Musk, et. al., support, for example, Curtis Yarvin, who believes that democracy is a failed experiment and should be replaced with an all-powerful "CEO"


> Thiel, Musk, et. al., support, for example, Curtis Yarvin, who believes that democracy is a failed experiment and should be replaced with an all-powerful "CEO"

These guys all benefit when the No-Politics Purity Brigade drives by and flag-kills every article pointing out their wrongdoing as "political." By flagging this stuff, they're actually making HN more political: They are defending billionaires, their agendas, and their status-quo politics.


The idea that hackers are non political is very silly and very unbacked up by evidence.

So I, as a software engineer, have to deal with the impacts of this administration both making my employment harder as well as terrorizing the city I live in. Where do you suggest I would go to share these issues other than the site that is specifically for hackers and tech workers?

I get that people want to make the place 'non-political', but a lot of us in the US live in major metropolitan areas and are very directly impacted by all of the shit going on.


"non-political" == pro status quo

But it's Blazingly Fast!

    I didn't notice this on reddit back when I used it
It was ever present. I'm afraid there is no solution to botting without excluding most of the Internet from a given website. HN has an even lower entry to barrier by not requiring an email as well.

    Sounds like a fun exercise :)
I'll be honest, that sounds like the opposite of fun since the worst parts of my job are touching the parts of a Python codebase that are untyped. The sad part is this work codebase isn't even that old, maybe a few years, and the developers definitely should have known better if they had anyone capable leading them. Alas, they're all gone now.

Harder than figuring out the instruction set for some exotic CPU are definitely the giant untyped dicts/lists common in data science code.


Ask yourself a question, should we protect a trillion dollar company from perpetuating child abuse by trivializing their harm and compare it to speeding?

btw, school zones are 20mph or less. It's telling in this analogy that you don't seem to have children of your own?


> you don't seem to have children of your own?

No, your intuition is incorrect. I often think of the random carnage inflicted by automobiles on bystanders as a model for societal inconsistency, which perhaps was the reason it came to mind for the hypothetical. Tire tracks across the sidewalk, marks on the post, just another risk wanly accepted by society.

Anyway, for a more extreme hypothetical, all you have to do is make the speed more egregious. One answer at 40mph; how high until the attorney walks you to the police station? 250mph? Habitual?


It's systematic is the problem. People have been trained by the auto/oil companies over fifty-plus-years to accept the unacceptable, that somehow the automobile is the only way to be "free" and be transported.

I don't think there's any speed in which an attorney turns you in for the crime of reckless operation since we (society) don't see the risk of harm that didn't lead to realized harm. If you injured or killed someone, you get turned in, but obviously that's too late.

I live on a 25mph street, I often see people traveling at double that speed and there are pedestrians nearly all the time. I've complained to the police only to be told that "it's infrequent so we can't catch them" despite this being a daily experience. I wish we lived in a different reality where these risks weren't so acceptable to the society.


I read it as "companies should not be the definition of what is ethical behavior", not your reading of "they should not be responsible for ethics".

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: