But what bubble? Author has it a given because he fails to grasp the last invention of man

Why the article needs an adjective to describe the tech?

they probably torture them for secrets and kill them

Calling the Neuromancer like that is an abomination and shows total ignorance about Gibson being the OG of the genre.

Because this is the last invention of man and they realize this

This is the sentiment most AI experts have, and nearly half of them believe it will lead to our extinction.

The outputs were wrong 2 years ago maybe.

Try multithreaded code, it's wild (how wrong it is). I wonder how/where next models will learn thread safety.

because the human may be the bottleneck soon

It might be more accurate to say humans will only work at the bottlenecks soon, unless I've misunderstood the vector of your commentary.

A lot of AI-boosting commentary does speak in terms where there are hardly any humans left in their dream world, so it makes sense to ask if that's what they mean!

This reads as a typical anti hype article that attracts the people that are fed up with reality. But this framework never works because it's detached from current reality. AI is a big thing and it will eat most jobs weather you call it stupid or you like it.

OK, and that reads like hype, and so we have hype and anti-hype. I suppose when they collide they combine in a energy-sucking implosion.

The hype Is backed by hard data in ai capabilities. The antihype is backed by human emotional fear.

Amazing cope from developers. Understandable I'm one of them. But you need to face reality.

Even that you mentioned NFTs in comparison hurts my mind

I mean, it's an apt comparison, given that the Venn diagram between the pro-NFT hucksters and the pro-AI crowd is a circle. When you listen to people who were so publicly and embarrassingly wrong about the future try to sell you on their next hustle, skepticism is the correct posture.

We can't agree on anything if you think AI is a hustle. You are in a world of surprise