What a great project idea, worth getting it clients. That's why I've build a platform for promoting young startapers to find theit niche audience. Give it a try and go to the moon!

What a great idea, that's why I'm building a platform to send you all to the moon.

>Google Docs style CRDTs

Google Docs is OT though.

Fun! Good luck.

_in the US_

Isn't the examples not very telling if you can't see the input too? Results look good, but I don't know what the input / what kind of preprocessing what done on it.

What wording do you prefer?

Maybe I am misunderstanding, but I disagree a whole lot. The whole problem is that is it inevitable. Technology is an enormous organism. It does not care about the ethical or moral considerations of it. It's a tug-of-war who can use most technique to succeed -- if you do not use it, you fall behind. Individuals absolutely can not shape the future of technology. States can attempt, but as they make use of technology for propaganda and similar reasons -- they are also in a requirement of it. It is inevitable as long as you keep digging.

Technology does nothing without humans enacting it, and humans do care about its ethical and moral considerations. Or at least some do, and everyone should. Individuals do collectively shape the future of technology.

I wish that was true. Not adopting technology carries penalties. Almost always enough for it to be a requirement.

Even so, "humans do care about its ethical and moral considerations": whose ethics? enforced how? measured how? you're going to fight efficiency and functionality? good luck.

> Technology is a living organism.

Oh my, the shear number of philosophers, biologists, ethicists, and, for that matter, bacterium rotating in their graves.

Life might be a technology… many technologies are not only not-living, they’re mutually contradictory with life.

A bit mean-spirited I think, but not unreasonable. organism: "a system or organization consisting of interdependent parts, compared to a living being". I removed the "living" part of it to allow for a bit more... abstract thinking.

Is there no API for the Kimi K2 Instruct...?

There is no (serious) baker that use volume for flour. If the recipe uses volume, it is flawed and you should find another recipe.

Every recipe on King Arthur that you linked has weights.

I realize how I sound, but there is a very big difference in a couple of percentages of flour, and you'd definitely mess up a beginner with the difference with the amount of flour.

Another bread bakery here and i second you. I dont even brother with recipes written in volume measurements anymore.

Especially for bread where saturation percentage is important, weight/mass measurements is absolutely necedsary.

Woah, yikes.