Do you have any idea why the win rate for GPT-5.2 is higher than Gemini 3 Flash yet the former loses money while the latter earns money? Is it just bet sizing (betting more when it has a good hand) or something else?
There are a few reasons that come to mind, such as winning larger pots on average, and also playing more hands by virtue of not getting knocked out as frequently.
Do you let organizations white-label it so its more customized (i.e. remove the Onyx branding, preload it with their internal MCP servers / docs) and feels like their own internal chat tool?
Yes absolutely! There's no license restriction on white-labeling, so we've seen lots of companies do that.
In our opinion, it's a bit silly to build completely in house when you can take something like Onyx as the starting point and be >95% of the way there + have a tons of bells and whistles built in.
We can handle 2FA during login. Regarding refreshing auth, it depends on the platform. We can help remain logged in nearly indefinitely on some platforms, while others would require users to re-login periodically.
If Zapier is your mental model, the use case there is trigger/action workflows which is a different from 2-way sync which I'd say Nango does well. For the former you might want to check out this open-source project I work on: https://github.com/RolloutHQ/rollout
Automattic basically consolidated the messaging aggregator market for $175M - I don't have any data but given they had 40 FTE between the two companies, I would guess not more than $10M in revenue across the two. Anyone understand the business rationale for wanting to own this market?
No matter what, as long as we continue to communicate with each other, messaging will never die. Individual messaging platforms will come and go but the idea of instant messaging has existed for about as long as the internet. $175M might be a steal if Beeper gets more mass market appeal.
Yes. Messaging will never die. Given that, why has it been so difficult for so many to get a toe-hold - and be sustainable - for so long?
I agree with the sentiment of your comment. However, I'm not sure it answers: what's the justification of this purchase? What does the buyer know that others have not?
Yeah, my first response was going to be that the paid messaging app business model hasn't worked that entire time. But what we've learned from Whatsapp is that there may be other ways to monetize (Whatsapp Business). Still not an obvious bet IMO but you're right that owning the messaging layer is valuable.
These apps are a gateway drug onto the Matrix protocol thereby eliminating the monopoly position of trillion dollar (evil) companies like WhatsApp (Meta).
What is the market size of people who care about "eliminating the monopoly position of trillion dollar (evil) companies"? And how will you monetize them?
Not that either Apple or Meta are even close to having a monopoly position in messaging.
MDX, with the custom content involved, is though.
I've been working on a hybrid WYSIWYG editor for MDX at Vrite (https://vrite.io).
Currently supports custom block elements and JSON-serializable attributes. Now looking into inline content and building an extension system to render custom previews for the nodes.
Check it out if you're interested - it's also open-source.
This looks great - I just tried to generate sample code in the react repo and was pleasantly surprised. Do you have a sense of whether this works well to generate code in general, i.e. generate an API route to return X data that works similar to the other API routes.
We haven't built it for code gen in particular, but a lot of our users seem to be using it for that. We want to really nail down people getting to understand what is going on in the codebase itself.
Thanks! This should work. The closest thing I tried was with quary.dev, where I had it generate a postgres connector and it referred to existing db connectors to generate the changes.
reply