Whereas you would previously (for your first example) have a conversation with the guy at the video store and he'd not only tell you the movie but also recommend something else you might like.

So instead, you'd drive there, to someone who also probably doesn't know, talk (while they might also not want to), and then, you might get a recommendation. You can also ask ChatGPT for recommendations. This isn't a case where I would return to pre-LLM times.

One day you'll understand how valuable it was to have a person with knowledge and their own thoughts.

Isn't that called socializing? And there's never been more people out there interested in whatever you're interested in.

What you really want is a story telling engine informing the world model and the humans need to generate power.

CiteSeer we barely knew you.

I'm surprised there are so few comments about it. It had more features than Google Scholar.

What are you doing here then?

What makes you consider this a bad blog post? I liked it

Not everyone cares about that.

They're talking about simulating big floppy structures in space.

Related: Alright is one word.

So very often it's written "all right" by folks writing the subtitles.

The vast majority of reputable sources that appear via search engine say that alright is the informal version and all right is the formal version.

Let's say that the latter is indeed an overcorrection and alright is the correct version; is the first syllable not actually referring to the notion of everything i.e. all -- it's some other prefix?

a'ight.

pretty sure I’ve seen it spelled awright. Unless that has a different meaning: Aww—right.

A common mistake I see: Every day is two words, everyday is strictly an adjective e.g. an everyday occurrence.

If you're the kind of person who goes to the comments first, I'm here to tell you there's no need to read the article. Just say "bossware" to yourself 10 times.