Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | MatejKafka's commentslogin

Personally, I just move SSH to a random high port on each of my public servers. Works like magic, no more log noise.


I don't think it's about trying to handwave away the achievement. The problem is that many AI proponents, and especially companies producing the LLM tools constantly overstate the wins while downplaying the issues, and that leads to a (not always rational) counter-reaction from the other side.


It is especially glaring in this case because, when queried, it is clear that far too many of the most zealous proponents don't even understand the simplest basics of how these models actually work (e.g. tokenization, positional or other encoding schemes, linear algebra, pre-training, basic input/output shaping/dimensions, recursive application, training data sources, etc).

There are simple limitations that follow from these basic facts (or which follow with e.g. extreme but not 100% certainty), such that many experts openly state that e.g. LLMs have serious limitations, but, still, despite all this, you get some very extreme claims about capabilities, from supporters, that are extremely hard to reconcile with these basic and indisputable facts.

That, and the massive investment and financial incentives means that the counter-reaction is really quite rational (but still potentially unwarranted, in some/many practical cases).


The same crap happened with cryptocurrency: it was either aggressively pro or aggressively against, and everyone who could be heard was yelling as loud as they could so they didn't have to hear disagreement.

There is no loud, moderate voice. It makes me very tired of the blasting rhetoric that invades _every_ space.


https://simonwillison.net/ is a pretty loud and moderate voice in the community. Also active on Lobste.rs: https://lobste.rs/~simonw

But agree that there's an irrational level of tribalism on both sides.


Lobste.rs mostly are what HN used to be, with less focus on startup culture and more focus on hacking.


And with idiotic blocking of people based solely on the browser they use. They are small minded people over at lobster.rs.


Microsoft tried with UWP. Developers mostly refused, for various reasons.


> Microsoft doesn't have a very good track record with security or privacy.

That's a very unfair assessment. In many areas, Microsoft services and Windows are better protected than most alternatives (e.g., disk encryption, virtualization-based isolation,...), and security is taken pretty seriously for new products.


You can just turn off Defender using a group policy.


True for the popular subreddits, but there are occasional niche communities that imo managed to keep the forum vibe (e.g., r/progmetal, r/cpp).


That's hard to implement, because typically, constructs like this will be the result of various previous passes (macro expansion, inlining, dead code elimination,...), typically it's not written by the user directly.


Have you tried Kagi?


Microsoft also has many engineers working on compilers, with open positions - MSVC, C#, F#, CLR, rustc and other projects.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: