Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Isn0gud's commentslogin

And then each time you refactor your code, your work doubled as you now also need to refactor your tests.


If your tests are testing the structure of your code, then this is true. But if you test for functionality/features of your API then you can freely refactor below that layer of abstraction.


Which solutions are you referring to? With access that is highly diverse and changing, this is still an unsolved problem to my knowledge.


Probably Google Zanzibar (and the various non-Google systems that were created as a result of the paper describing Zanzibar).


The ikea vindstyrka sensor is 50$, how is this 4x the price?


We added many components that are not strictly needed to measure air quality but make the device an interesting platform for custom projects. Also, the enclosure is more premium, being made from aluminum. Finally, IKEA can leverage economy of scale and probably gets a much better price on most parts.


Any co2 measuring device costs at least 70$. All devices i know with internet connectivity costs 150$+.


My Qingping Monitor Lite with SenseAir S8 co2 sensor, pm2.5, wifi, and oled display seems to be accurate enough and was only $45.


They might be smart about it like you said, but they might also just be stupid. And the theory that they are smart about it is based on a whole bunch more assumptions...


This is not local, but uses the Tavily cloud (https://tavily.com/) ?!


Just downloaded it and mucked about. It definitely works without the cloud, because it works while I'm offline. Looking at the code, it looks like an opt-in feature where you can provide your API key to Tavily.

That said, it seems built toward "Cheat on your homework" and doesn't reliably surface information from my notes, so I uninstalled it.



This is getting murky.

As a suggestion to the author, please try to make it verifiably local only with an easy to set option.


Tavily search is an option, disabled by default.

Maybe the author could make a note of that in the README.


Doesn't sound like solved problem to me if you have to employ more than four different mitigation strategies.


Cookie prompts is the best example of bad faith compliance. Please inform yourself and don't spread this narritive further.


https://gdpr.eu is an interesting site to visit on the matter, surely they have the best and most compliant implementation.

https://i.imgur.com/Ftuv74P.png


IMO if anything it's the opposite. EU could have made law to respect DNT header if they wanted privacy but they won't because it would hurt "their" companies. Instead they tried to be super vague and preferentially sue companies who they have qualms with and the companies which they could get money from.

My previous company hired a lawyer from EU for sorting out GDPR, and even according to him the law didn't prevented all things which hurts privacy like a normal person will assume.


I am once again posting the EU official site using cookie pop-ups https://european-union.europa.eu/index_en


>The 3 types of first-party cookie we use are to: >(...) >gather analytics data (about user behaviour).

Well they do collect user data using third party services. A bit disappointing, but banners seem to be necessary in this case.


Quoting OP

> Cookie prompts is the best example of bad faith compliance

If cookie prompts are used by both by the official EU and GDPR sites then that was clearly the intent of the law.


You can’t argue with cookie prompt lovers. They love clicking on those useless buttons.


Don't love your job, it will never love you back.


love your profession and do your job professionally


Is there also research on the relative importance in exercise?


I found Dr. Daniel Lieberman 's work helpful. His book Exercised makes his work fairly accessible.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lieberman


Why?


Because if you have a website you are legally liable for what someone else posts if you don't remove it within 24 hours of a report, which makes running a social network impractical. (NetzDG, KoPl-G, Digital Services Act (DSA), etc)

Having actual free speech would solve that (and a lot of other problems).


What do you consider to be actual free speech?


Is that solved for American websites?



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: